Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.

Some people say that making new friends is important, so from time to time, they forget the importance of the existence of old friends. I would like to emphasize on more keeping old friends is vital in our life. This essay will explain why keeping our old friends is essential than making new friends.

First of all, old friends know me better, not only my positive side but also my drawbacks. That makes me more comfortable. For example, if we travel together, my old friend would know me already that I am not good at finding the route. So they would be responsible more for finding direction, and they would not be disappointed at it. Likewise, I can accept that when my old friend show their weakness because there is no reason between us to take care about hiding our own weakness.

Furthermore, old friends can share their own memories which were exciting or crucial in past. By remembering this memory, again and again, they feel that we are not alone. In addition to that, they never get boring whenever they talk about their last days. But a new friend has less memory relatively, so we cannot share many things with a new person.

Consequently, I consider that old friend is more important than making new friends. In spite of freshness and stimulation from new friends, nonetheless, they cannot replace the place of old friendship.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...e care about hiding our own weakness Furthermore old friends can share their own memorie...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
... share many things with a new person Consequently I consider that old friend is more impo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, likewise, nonetheless, so, for example, in addition, first of all, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 52.1666666667 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 1977.66487455 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 235.0 407.700716846 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63404255319 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41400771078 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 212.727598566 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56170212766 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 618.680645161 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 235.0 20.1344086022 1167% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1089.0 100.406767564 1085% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 235.0 20.6045352989 1141% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 127.0 5.45110844103 2330% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379968452816 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.379968452816 0.076458572812 497% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275355855281 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1404715731 0.0645574589148 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 117.9 11.7677419355 1002% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -150.13 58.1214874552 -258% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 92.6 10.1575268817 912% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.05 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.44 8.01818996416 218% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 32.0 86.8835125448 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 52.0 10.002688172 520% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 96.0 10.0537634409 955% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 93.0 10.247311828 908% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.