Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
News is a vital part of society. Individuals can get information and events which is happening around them by watching TV or reading newspaper. Some people believes that reading or watching news which is presented by somebody whose views are different from their own is more important than similar, while others disagree. In my opinion, I think similarity in views of someone who watch and who present news is more crucial than differentiation for two critical reasons.
First and foremost, when people watch or read news which presented by someone whose views is similar from their view, they can understand news completely and easily. In modern day, by expanding the world and population, thousand events occur all around of the world. Everyone who present them has different view on them. If individuals watch that news is near to their belief, they will follow and notice them. For example, last week, a big explosion happened in Tehran which is the biggest city of Iran. Every media interpreted this event in the way they liked. Some believed that it was due to a someone’s mistake, while others asserts it was a spying plan. I followed the news of Washington post because they told every story honestly without omitting any details. As over time, it is revealed by Washington post that event was occurred by someone’s mistake. As you can see, people like to chase those media which have the same view on events.
Second, when people watch or read news which is presented by someone whose views is similar from their view, they do not have to waste time to listen to a lot of resources. By expansion of technology, people has an access to different media. It is so hard to follow every of them every day. So, people only follow them which have the same approach to news. For instance, I use one channel of Telegram to get information about my country while I live in another country. I am accustomed to use its news for long time. Now, I am studying PhD at university and I am so busy to follow all media such as Facebook, Tweeter and so on. As you can see, people follow only that news is presented by someone whose views are similar to them to aviod wasting their time.
In conclusion, people incline to chase news which is presented by someone who has the same view. This similarity can help individuals understand better but also save their time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... by expanding the world and population, thousand events occur all around of the world. E...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...hran which is the biggest city of Iran. Every media interpreted this event in the way...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 596, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'someone'?
Suggestion: a; someone
...liked. Some believed that it was due to a someone’s mistake, while others asserts it was ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
... By expansion of technology, people has an access to different media. It is so hard to fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to using'.
Suggestion: accustomed to using
...y while I live in another country. I am accustomed to use its news for long time. Now, I am study...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, honestly, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71256038647 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51375013978 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475845410628 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7384167275 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2916666667 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395363173403 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116955826759 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130929769412 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275100201783 0.150856017488 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105343690153 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.