Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this modern world it is really arduous to have a trust worthy friends because now a days people are getting more materialistic. Some people are inclined toward the attitude that keep making new friends and forget the older ones, whereas, others hold different perspective. No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects. I personally, though, believe that people should keep the old friends . In the following essay, I intend to put forth my points and reasons for support.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that, old friends always help you because with time friendship only gets stronger. To exemplify, when I was in school my friends are limited to the count of four and they are helpful and caring. One day I was driving to home and suddenly my car broke and its was dark. I was scared and called my friend for help at 2 AM she came with her brother to fix my car. As a result, just because of my old friend I reached my home safely. Therefore, this example illustrates that a friend in need is a friend indeed and old is gold.
Secondly, the new friends are not as reliable as old friends. If are person keep making new friends that person can never have a bond, as good bonding takes time. To explain broadly, its is not significant to make new friends because how one person can know other person in just weeks or months. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience one day my mom and dad was fighting and after watching that my feeling was so confused, it made me feel depressed. I was accustomed to make new friend all the time and I shared everything about my home with my friends. I was shocked when I heard the story by my classmates. Since then I stopped making friends. Thus, this experience taught me that always give respect to your old friends.
In the light of the reasons mentioned above, I strongly believe that people should keep old friends and do not trust all new friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
... to have a trust worthy friends because now a days people are getting more materialistic. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... that people should keep the old friends . In the following essay, I intend to put...
^^
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r. To exemplify, when I was in school my friends are limited to the count of four...
^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to making'.
Suggestion: accustomed to making
...fused, it made me feel depressed. I was accustomed to make new friend all the time and I shared ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...erything about my home with my friends. I was shocked when I heard the story by m...
^
Line 3, column 678, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hen I heard the story by my classmates. Since then I stopped making friends. Thus, th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50137741047 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43527492114 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523415977961 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7557051221 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.15 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26752680888 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952467727522 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639242994512 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182255443702 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205737069409 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.