Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friends.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Without a shadow of a doubt, friends play an integral role in everyone's life. The point here is to have good friends and also maintain the relationship. In this line of thought, while some people think it would be harmful to people to migrate or move to another city or country, it is my firm conviction that changing the place we live not only will not have any negative effect on our circle of friends, it will also enhance it. In what follows, I will elaborate on the rationale that my perspective is based on.
The first and foremost reason is that by moving to a new city, people will form new friendships with recently met people. Being in a new place enables persons to have some different opportunities to meet new people. As a generalization, when someone starts a new life in a place, he will absolutely get involved in new activities, which leads him to be in new groups. Take my own experience as a compelling example. About ten years ago, I left my original living city to start a new life in the capital. As a monumental change, I also began my studies in a university, which was full of people just with the same condition as me. Then I found a great number of new friends who, most of them, are still in contact with me. Hadn't I moved to a new city, I could not form those precious friendships.
The second vindicating reason that I should mention is that considering the newly emerged technology-based connecting tools, it is much easier to keep in contact with friends, even with those who are in distant places. To put it in other words, thanks to the technology, we use many applications that have facilitated the connection process. For instance, I use a cellphone software named Whatsapp, which offers online video chats. Hence, I used it to talk with my old friends any time I needed them. With these applications, rarely do I miss my fellows.
Furthermore, I should add that the transportation industry has made big progress in recent decades. Thus it is now plausible to go any places we want in a short time. The distance issue is not a problem anymore. Clearly, airplanes are amazingly fast, so no one will ever lose a friend because of being in a faraway land.
To put it in a nutshell, I believe we will not lose our mates if we migrate to other towns. Obviously, it will even help us to make new friends, and because of the high development in technology and transportation, we will be able to sustain our relationships at an acceptable level.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 722, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Hadn't
... of them, are still in contact with me. Hadnt I moved to a new city, I could not form...
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus, made big progress in recent decades. Thus it is now plausible to go any places we...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, still, then, thus, while, for instance, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54362416107 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83058327074 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559284116331 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.976468587 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3043478261 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4347826087 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47826086957 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177905169595 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498435099757 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403844129925 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878781990123 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445503283331 0.0645574589148 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.