Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Many characteristics in humans define our personality, and leadership is one of the most important ones. While some people think that leadership is inherent, others believe otherwise. As far as I am concerned, I totally believe that leadership can be taught, and people can learn it just like any other ability. The reasons why I think so will be elaborated upon hereunder.
First of all, in today's modern world, people can learn everything through education. Many universities and colleges around the world have specific curriculums for teaching management. People attend those institutes to learn how to manage their businesses. Statistics show that people who have a background in those education fields are far better able to run and manage their establishments. Great managers and teachers have attended university to learn management. My own example illustrates this reality. A few years ago, one of my cousins, who lived in their village, wanted to be the manager of a large organization. At first, everyone laughed at him, but he was very determined to pursue it. He went to university and studied management. He was very passionate and motivated to do what he wanted to do. He studied really hard and got his master's degree. Now he works at a company and has a managing position. He is not the boss yet, but because he is on the right track, I think his dreams about being the chief manager of a big company will come true in a few years.
Second, people can learn leadership by watching or reading about great leaders in the world. There are many great leaders, and those who work near them, have an excellent opportunity to learn from them. People can observe their behaviors and reactions in difficult situations. Moreover, some of the great leaders have published their own autobiographies. People can understand their thoughts and beliefs about important things, such as controlling stress or interacting with others. For example, a couple of years ago, when I was doing my military service, I was the commander of about twenty soldiers. I had no idea how to control them and keep them safe. However, I found a book that an American colonel had written about his first experiences of war in World War Two. It had so many good points, and I learned a lot of things. Thanks to that book, I successfully controlled my soldiers, and they all went home without a scratch.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I strongly believe that people can learn how to lead. They can learn in universities and colleges. Furthermore, by watching other leaders and reading about them, people can learn many things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 808, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d motivated to do what he wanted to do. He studied really hard and got his masters...
^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ions in difficult situations. Moreover, some of the great leaders have published their own ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91441441441 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83623578403 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531531531532 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8533452434 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.7333333333 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.43333333333 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129326703197 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357448042964 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290846415851 0.0737576698707 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881279537815 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214885584526 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.