Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that in today's sophisticated world that we live, leadership skill plays a key role in doing a wide area of tasks. People may face some problems in their everyday life which require the power of leadership. A controversial question, which is often raised regarding this issue, is whether leadership is an intrinsic ability or it can be learned. It is a commonly held idea that people can learn leadership ability. I personally agree with this issue. In the lines below I will presents and explain two main reasons to support my idea.
The first reason to be mentioned is people can learn leadership ability by reading some related books and other educational materials. To be more specific, nowadays people have access to kinds of hard books or can easily find the needed data through the internet. As a matter of fact, the Internet is a treasure trove of information and one can search and gain information by a single click. There is a huge amount of invaluable context to improve leadership skills. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a student at the university, I suffered from leadership ability, which has a great negative impact on my doing activity. I cannot handle my study and other everyday issues well, and this matter made me depressed. This matter caused me to draw a conclusion that I should improve my leadership ability. After a while, I found it in reading a successful and well-written book. As a result, it helps me to gain more efficiency.
Furthermore, people can gain leadership ability by following well-known people who are famous in Leadership. To illustrate, when people set some role models in their life and pursue them, they want to imitate their actions in tough situations, which can be helpful for them. A number of eminent researchers at the University of Tehran's center for social studies have concluded that the people who pursue role models such as Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg, who are very decent leaders in the area of their expertise posses, have 30% more self-satisfaction in their professional life and they do their various job with more consideration.
To sum up, taking all the aforementioned arguments into consideration, it can be concluded that if we see the subject holistically, we can learn leadership by reading related educational materials and following some role models which are successful in this matter. Let us hope, this matter would be more considered by society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 499, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'present'
Suggestion: present
...h this issue. In the lines below I will presents and explain two main reasons to support...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, well, while, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96163069544 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9307931529 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532374100719 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4082795753 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5238095238 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160037542275 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505512162525 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312924373567 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100956910512 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290281943653 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.