Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Newspapers and magazines are the best ways to learn about a foreign country.
With the advent of new means for information circulation, many facets of our lives have been changed. For example, thanks to newspapers, magazines and the internet, people can become informed of every region globally, and it does not matter how far those regions are. While some economists argue that newspapers and magazines are the best way to learn about different countries, some others play devil’s advocate and state that nowadays, the internet and other facilities are more efficient to be used as information resources. In my view, newspapers and magazines are not reliable sources of information, and we cannot trust them for two main reasons.
First and foremost, many countries of the world have a dictatorship regime, and because of that, their government has absolute power over information and news sources means. Dictatorship regimes do not let other people notice what is happening in their countries. Therefore, because I live in one of those countries, public newspapers and magazines are not safe and trusted enough to become informed about foreign countries.
Finally, due to the fast pace of the world change, newspapers and magazines cannot provide up-to-date enough information to their readers. For example, my family and I wanted to travel to Mexico two years ago, and we started to search for their cultures, food and Mexico's climate. At first, we read an article about its climate in a newspaper. In that newspaper, the climate of Mexico was described as an arid desert which led us to alter our decision toward traveling to Mexico. Nevertheless, some years later, we realized that the article we read just wrote about well-known areas of Mexico and not all of that since many regions and places in Mexico were not found and explored since then. As a result, a newspaper disinformed us because it was not up to date enough.
To put it in a nutshell, I claimed that newspapers and magazines are not valid and reliable resources by which we can obtain new information about foreign countries for two chief reasons. Firstly, many dictatorship governors use censorship in order to rule people and intensify their power. Secondly, newspapers and magazines are not up-to-date enough to provide trusted information to readers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15803814714 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78900370697 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523160762943 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8771498317 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3125 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17805245458 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590903947424 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524805076999 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117858186109 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404331832059 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.