Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
With no doubt, humankind instinctively seeks to have affection for others. Philanthropic causes, always were important for all people around the world, as today. Admittedly, I believe that presently, due to the epoch-making invention of the internet and better welfare that the majority of the residents in society possess, people have more enthusiasm to help and donate for those who need more assistant.
To begin with, through the internet, we can be aware of various happening around the world. Nowadays, people gain information about many catastrophic events, such as earthquakes more easily than in the past. In this way, they will be encouraged to help other people who need their attention. Moreover, numerous private and non-private foundations have been created that promote residents of society to contribute to their humanitarian missions. Thanks to these efforts, people get more awareness and become excited to help others. As an illustration, my father has established a foundation in which their focus is on the poor children who live in slums. They advertise their activities through social media and they have been successful in grabbing people's attention to come and assist in providing a better life situation for those kids. They have accumulated a variety of clothes for deprived families.
What's more, these days people chiefly can provide their families, life with an acceptable caliber for living needs. In fact, we can observe throughout society that today, families can afford to have the great living condition, in comparison to the past, that amenities were rare and people hardly ever became satisfied by their needs. But now, kids, for example, normally, have what they want, like clothes, toys and so forth. In this case, people feel no more needs and they will be willing to help others by donating their useless clothes, for example.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that these days, people are more eager to assist other people. The advent of the internet and various foundations are very effective to encourage people to help. Also, owing to better living circumstances that most of the families have, they have more willing to donate their useless clothes, for instance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'were'.
Suggestion: were always
...ction for others. Philanthropic causes, always were important for all people around the wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...iety of clothes for deprived families. Whats more, these days people chiefly can pro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25141242938 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68521064713 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556497175141 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4335168613 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.277777778 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302872870407 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109674690869 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634060912465 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209616906222 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263985063369 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.