Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Everybody have their own statements about many different parts of our existence. Politics and other people knowledge are the most popular topics of discussion. But from which resources people are obtaining their information to judge what is right or what is wrong? Some people may believe that checking couple news resources is necessary to make right conclusion. I completely agree with them and I will explain it in two main reasons.
Firstly, some information resource may lie. A lot of people are lying, that is not a secret, but why they are doing it? The answer is simple, to make a profit. A lot of news portals thinks that better to say lie, than do not say nothing. Thus, it is our responsibility to compare couple information sources because based on only one false news, our statement is not correct. For example, I remember when my friend Tom. He was working as business analytic, and his main duty was to monitor business news and speculations. One day, he received information about stock market of niche company, in which his company invested huge amount of money. He decided to inform his boss about it right away. Based on Tom’s reputation, His supervisor decided to sell all stocks. After two days They discovered that it was fake news and his company lost all funds. Because of one fake information, my friend Tom lost his great job.
Secondly, Information provided from one source may be incomplete. Nobody knows everything, which means that checking couple sources of information is the only way to gather complete data. Thus, nobody will risk reputation to make a statement from small part of the information. For instance, I remember when I was preparing for my geography exam about small country of Poland. I have found the information from one traveler, Peter Johnson. As he wrote, He was in Poland two times and described this country as very wealthy and beautiful country. But nothing detailed, and after digging for more info, I have found article which was wrote by Polish native, Tomasz Benesz. He was describing Poland it more detailed with huge amount of knowledge.
In conclusion, Many different information resources is necessary to make solid and true statement, some news may be lie, or some may be incomplete and it is our duty to find the truth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...erybody have their own statements about many different parts of our existence. Politics and ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
... portals thinks that better to say lie, than do not say nothing. Thus, it is our res...
^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: NOT_NOTHING[1]
Message: Double negation. You probably should say 'anything'.
Suggestion: anything
...that better to say lie, than do not say nothing. Thus, it is our responsibility to comp...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 633, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'written'.
Suggestion: written
...re info, I have found article which was wrote by Polish native, Tomasz Benesz. He was...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'Many'.
Suggestion: Many
... amount of knowledge. In conclusion, Many different information resources is necessary to m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91259640103 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68580823279 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516709511568 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0299416135 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9615384615 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03846153846 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170546989948 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463180597214 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447891051399 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119733527844 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348832406864 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.