Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A controversial issue relating to using many different resources of information or not, has been brought to the attention of the general public. In my opinion, people will benefit if decide to use not just only one side of the stories, but use many different sides.
First of all, by referring to different news resources, people will be able broaden their vision of seeing things in different angles. For example, if civilians know about a particular story because they had read about it on different magazines or newspapers, then they would understand better, and that will help them to shape their own opinion about that story. Moreover, it is important to see different perspectives, and try to analyze them. This will expand their horizon and make people more open minded. Overall, this tells us that individuals will see things differently if they are open to not oly one resource, but a variety of them.
Second of all, being well informed is crucial for coming up with good conclusions of any kind of information that they absorbed. To be more specific, my experience as an interested person in the current events that are happening now around the world is a compelling example of this. A couple of days ago, I read an article, which described a story about the bad decisions that the government of the United States made about allocating some founds to other countries. That news sparked a huge curiosity to me, such as I tried to find other newspapers that wrote about the same news. Eventually, I was able to find a few of them, which addressed the same story differently. After a quick thinking, I realized that all details that other newspapers described were very important part of the story. I drew the conclusion that reading one source is not enough. According to this experience, people, who are well informed, always will understand things better and come up with good conclusions.
In conclusion, general public should read many different resources. This is because they will be able to broaden their vision, and because that will help them to make smart conclusions for what they are interested of knowing well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...A controversial issue relating to using many different resources of information or not, has be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...as been brought to the attention of the general public. In my opinion, people will benefit if ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t only one side of the stories, but use many different sides. First of all, by referring to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 902, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding to this experience, people, who are well informed, always will understand th...
^^
Line 5, column 919, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'will' and 'understand'.
Suggestion: will always understand
...rience, people, who are well informed, always will understand things better and come up with good con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ith good conclusions. In conclusion, general public should read many different resources. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... conclusion, general public should read many different resources. This is because they will be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91712707182 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70416451483 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544198895028 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9636524579 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.705882353 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15484332658 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534035795398 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559064187417 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105654391217 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496128883788 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.