Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of the impact our current way of life on the future generations. If I were asked about this matter, I would defiantly agree with that statement for a number of reasons, I will develop in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, all the technical progress we arrived to is awesome and all, but have we really thought of the impact of all that progress on the environment. Many scientists have said that the revolutionary of technology is actually harming the environment more than it benefit us, all these cars and factories pollute hardly damage our surroundings. I have to admit that my opinion on that matter has been profoundly influenced by my own experience. You see, having me travelling outside my neighborhood made me know for sure how the nature is suffering from us, all our dumps are the main reason for world’s increase in temperature. As a result, if we are going to stay on this same way of living the consequence will be really bad for the future generations.
Secondly, if we continue on that same way of consumption, we will end up suffering from the lake of resources, so we have to find new ways to prevent this ending from happening. Some people might say that we won’t be alive when that happens, but that not true, many scientists says that we are actually on the verge of consuming all our resources so even if we ourselves won’t be affected by that we have to think about the incoming generations. Drawing from my own experience, even if it’s just a small simulation but it’s actually a good example, so when I was only a child I used to live in a small village, we used wood to create fire rather than using gas because the distance between us and the city was so far it was so expensive for someone to have electricity in their homes, so I thought If we used all the wood around the village how our children will have their food cooked. So it’s certainly clear to see why continuing on that same way of life will negatively affect future children.
In the light of the above mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that we have to find new ways of living so we can secure a shining future for those who are going to be there.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, really, second, secondly, so, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53539973 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 405.0 20.1344086022 2011% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1782.0 100.406767564 1775% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 405.0 20.6045352989 1966% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 75.0 5.45110844103 1376% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 11.8709677419 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244568868279 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.244568868279 0.076458572812 320% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179384825809 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106364088472 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 201.8 11.7677419355 1715% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -331.14 58.1214874552 -570% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 160.1 10.1575268817 1576% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.72 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 26.22 8.01818996416 327% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 10.002688172 560% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 164.0 10.0537634409 1631% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 202.0 10.247311828 1971% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.