Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Everybody today is seeking for better future. While some people believe that it is easier to find which career will lead to a successful life, others believe the opposite. For me, I believe that it was easier in the past to predict which job can lead to a secure, successful life. And I choose this opinion according to three convincing reasons. Which I will discuss in the following paragraphs.
The fist reason related to the fact that in the past there were limited jobs. In other words, less positions were available than today. For instance, in the past a company was containing only the manager and employees of same positions. Nowadays, The same company has manager and different employees' positions. each with different type of work. Which in turn will lead to difficult to see which type of field will me more successful than others.
Another reason related to the research reliability. In the past it was easy to see which career is the best and which one is the worst. Research studies was depending on a reliable resources, which established in newspapers. However, today, there are many sources to find out about the successful career, and each one of them has its own research data, which make it difficult for people to find out which career is better. For example, a nurse career was not that successful and there was a strong evidence in a newspaper, New York Times, where a certain reliable company did this research. Nevertheless, now there are another resources such as Wikipedia, which is very unreliable source, saying that nurse career is the best place a person can have for a successful life.
The last reason is that the number of people who are working was way too less than now. Which make it easy to collect the date and do research. Yet, now is more difficult to hold research since the number of people has doubled about 5 times according to Yale's University research, especially that women now are working along the men and not staying home as it was in the past.
As a conclusion, I am strongly agree that in the past it was easy to know which type of work will lead to a secure life, because limited jobs and positions were than today, also, researches were depending on a reliable sources, also, the number of people working in the past was less than today.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... according to three convincing reasons. Which I will discuss in the following paragra...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun positions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...here were limited jobs. In other words, less positions were available than today. Fo...
^^^^
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ay. For instance, in the past a company was containing only the manager and employees of same ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Each
...ager and different employees positions. each with different type of work. Which in t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 345, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ions. each with different type of work. Which in turn will lead to difficult to see w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...hich one is the worst. Research studies was depending on a reliable resources, which establis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'resource'?
Suggestion: resource
...rch studies was depending on a reliable resources, which established in newspapers. Howev...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...e past. As a conclusion, I am strongly agree that in the past it was easy to know wh...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...tions were than today, also, researches were depending on a reliable sources, also, the number...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69059405941 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49746832895 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438118811881 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2571469029 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2380952381 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2380952381 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47619047619 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193220762399 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641183908182 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048919821307 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11766104701 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036443850809 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.