Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Wanderlust is a one of the major source of entertainment in this world. It is hardly possible to find any human who has not likeability to travel. The world is full of outstanding places, countrys, monuments and also cities. From south to north the world is full of surprise. Traveling to foreign land is better than roaming to the native land- someone would compelled with the ideas. In my view, wander lusting to the native landscape is better than outside of the country because of the following two important reason.
The main reason is that traveling to own country is cost effective. Whenever, we are planning to travel we have to scheme plan in order to match with our budget. Such as, where we want to go, which resort we will likely to rent and how many days we will have to spend. These are the very basic questions of any travel person. For example, I was born in a remote and impoverished area of Bangladesh. From my childhood I am being used to live with budgets. In school life, we were traveling many areas to satiate our mind. Because we were always run out of money, we had not enough privilege to go foreign country. And we were bounded to maintain according to our income which in lieu became cost effective. As you can see that as the travel does not depend on class, anyone can travel. That is why, to travel not too far from home is money saving.
Another important reason is that by traveling in native country will helps to build a patriotic mind. Patriotism is the central for anyone whether country you were born is not a big deal. By roaming one’s own country will avail to know the country in better ways. It will also help to decipher particular places culture, history and the way of livelihood. For instance, as I grown up a village, we were used to travel in accordance to the best historical places in our country. When we had seen many heroic figures who sacrificed their love in order to protect our country Bangladesh, an unbound respect and humility was arise. This kind of experiences would not have been possible if we were traveling any foreign land. This experience taught me that, it is necessary to roam the native country first in order to better know the countrys history.
In sum, someone would have presented enough benefits of wander lusting any foreign land but when examining in details such evidences will not effective in reality. Native journey will not only economical but also better to know the countrys detail. So, we should influences other to travel first native country then outside of the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'compel'
Suggestion: compel
...aming to the native land- someone would compelled with the ideas. In my view, wander lust...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whenever” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eling to own country is cost effective. Whenever, we are planning to travel we have to s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...hat by traveling in native country will helps to build a patriotic mind. Patriotism i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'grew'?
Suggestion: grew
...e way of livelihood. For instance, as I grown up a village, we were used to travel in...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to traveling', 'used to travelling'.
Suggestion: used to traveling; used to travelling
...tance, as I grown up a village, we were used to travel in accordance to the best historical pl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 622, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'arisen'.
Suggestion: arisen
...sh, an unbound respect and humility was arise. This kind of experiences would not hav...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66519823789 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45994518615 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495594713656 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5606011309 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.6428571429 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2142857143 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2664566849 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785400698893 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603149045985 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166516706538 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329802838073 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.