Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People communicate with each other less than in the past because of the popularity of television. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
At the society nowadays with the rapidly changing technology, we are exposed to a plethora of medias. It is undeniable that the impact of televisions is too vital to be neglected. A simple recognition of this lends to our discussions on whether people began to communicate with one another less than before due to the advent of televisions. Although some people adhere to agree with the statement, I personally disagree with that.
The first aspect to point out is that watching television and interpersonal communicating are not contradicted. Some people may argue that spending time on televisions reduces our communication. According to my experiences, nevertheless, the time I spend on those television shows only affect my solitary activities such as sleeping. In fact, I still chat with my family and friends frequently despite the new habit of watching televisions.
In addition, I even consider televisions conducive to our conversation contents. Watching the common channels, following the same dramas, and sharing the mutual perspectives or reviews are the best thing to do with others. As a matter of fact, an article written by a social worker once suggested that when we are running out of topics during the conversation, mentioning the television programs you have enjoyed lately would always help. Not only would it ameliorate the embarrassment, but we may also accidentally discover some hidden interests among one another.
Another point worth introducing is that televisions actually improve our communicating skills. The majority parts of most television programs such as news and talk shows are with some anchors or hosts talking. We can learn how to talk with others through watching professional speakers demonstrating, definitely.
On the whole according to the above-mentioned points and details, it is crystal-clear that televisions are not the necessarily lessen our communication with others. By contrast, it solely affects our solitary time, significantly broadens our narrow conversation topics, and successfully improves our communication ability. It is high time we insulated our children how important it is to communicate with others, instead of simply not allowing them to watch televisions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, in addition, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55685131195 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28508689921 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580174927114 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.652991494 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.888888889 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182680507406 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615447183127 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674444791434 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108834602273 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717544652691 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.