Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public.
It is an incontrovertible fact that in today’s state-of-the-art world, media play an important role in spreading news and giving awareness to people. With this in mind, there is a controversy whether the accuracy of news in comparison with the past has increased or otherwise. Although some people think that today media have less concern as to their news and information than past, I, personally, do believe otherwise, for several reasons, three of which--that is competition among media, rising the number of audiences, and improvement of instruments--are of great importance elaborating upon hereunder.
To begin with, by the passage of time the number and diversity of media have increased. Needless to say, the more diversity and number there be in a field, the more rivalry possibly will be created. Of so great intense are these competitions that each of media wants to outperform the others. To do so, having gathered all details and information about a subject, they tend to check them several times. Accordingly, in order to professionally do their duty, and be a winner in this difficult competition, they have to increase their attention and improve their precision. By doing so, they will be on the top of this widespread business of media.
Additionally, one of the most important goals for any media is increasing the number of its audiences. To do so, media need to build their reputation by working better and more accurate. Unless the accuracy of their information is high, the number of individuals who can trust them will be declined. If individuals do not have trust about the performance and honesty of a media, they will never choose it to watch. As a result, in order to keep pace with other media, meet all strata expectation, and being heard and watched by the more number of people, they tend to do their best. Therefore, they have increased "accuracy" the first priority to choose a media by people.
Last but not least, technology an integral part of today's life paving the way towards better performance in any field. Thanks to the invention of electrical instruments such as the camera, the quality of making reports in every moment of events have been provided. Hardly can be said that such reports are of low accuracy, while people can watch it live. In the past, however, the absence of such a practical and useful tools had effects on the media performance. Consequently, reporters were not able to explain events with all details which is nothing short of lack of accuracy.
In the light of all these reasons, I strictly am of the opinion that today, by virtue of technology, competition among media in order to outdo others and absorb much more audience, accuracy has increased compared to the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a medium' or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: a medium; media
...st about the performance and honesty of a media, they will never choose it to watch. As...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 665, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a medium' or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: a medium; media
...racy' the first priority to choose a media by people. Last but not least, techn...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 350, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lives'?
Suggestion: lives
...low accuracy, while people can watch it live. In the past, however, the absence of s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 52.1666666667 159% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97979354787 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51409978308 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1004929223 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.761904762 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9523809524 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19765901212 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618600620041 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464379485053 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115605570776 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603449724492 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.