Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take a risk rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take a risk rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

People place great emphasis on life’s achievement and pursue their life goals. Some people thus claim that being a successful person should usually try new things rather than do what they are adept. As far as I am concerned, I strongly disagree with such notion. Successful people need steadiness and have enjoyable practices. This essay will provide further aspects and examples to support this idea in the subsequent paragraphs.

First and foremost, success in life comes from steady hard-working. As doing what individuals are expert, people are able to excellently solve many problems and expose splendid performances. Consequently, people are capable of continually working with confidence, and it allows them to be successful. To illustrate this, most successful football players, such as Ronaldo and Messi, are not only talented, but they always work hard on their role. With their excessive endeavor, they practice basic football skills every single day and delicately improve their bodies. Repeatedly doing things that they are indeed proficient brings the trophies to them.

Secondly, another fact that supports my standpoint is that sometimes, individuals’ achievement is being happy in their career. People will be enjoyable during the period which they work perfectly. Although playing a new role sometimes makes people are excited, in the other hands, working what they know well is easier, and it makes people are delighted in unmistakable works. I can attest this from my own experience; my architecture company often develop the splendid quality of works and be successful because there is good operation. Staffs pleasure to work differently, such as drawing, designing, and model making, related to their potentialities. For this case, the staffs’ happiness is the main gist of this achievement.

In conclusion, I maintain the belief that proficient skill is essential to be successful in people life rather than experience from doing new things. This is due to the fact that success is made by constantly working with confidence, and people will be happier to what they good.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46808510638 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93041592873 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589665653495 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6027798613 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6842105263 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3157894737 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260436975159 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815726698957 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077545591431 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184102418483 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620800688454 0.0645574589148 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.