Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Education and leaning is an age-long process and teachers play important role in the life and future of their students. Most of students found the basis of their lives and ethics on what they learn from their teachers. Faced with this controversial question, quite a few would claim that teachers should be paid based on how much their students learn; in contrast others deem it is an unfair verdict regarding teachers. I personally agree with second group and my bases of reasons are moral and general.
According to moral view, teachers are one of the powerful role-models of their students. This expression is a great injustice toward both sides. It decreases the importance of a parallel educational relationship that based on respect, ethics and emotions. Besides, it changes general assessment factors about teachers and constructs it according to grade and money. Additionally, teachers may force students educationally and financially to demonstrate their performance as a good teacher. From the other side, teachers try hard to prepare educational materials for students and just moderate grade or low grades of students is not the teacher's fault. Some of the students do not study at all or some of them are weak and it is not a solid proof for teacher's weak performance. So, this presentation about both sides is unfair.
Generally, different students have different skills and learning abilities, it is an inherent not adventitious. This sort of treatments opens a biased tendency toward smart students and causes discrimination toward moderate and low level students, because they are evaluated through grades and skills. These kind of pointless prospects decrease the quality of teaching and force students to focus on certain topics to get better grades. In consequence, some moderate, low level students or poor ones become resentful, loss their motivation. Besides, it decreased the quality of education and creativity of both sides since the both of them are limited to certain subjects to get good mark. Furthermore, students do not feel respect toward their teachers or like them. For example, I remember, when I was on tenth level of my school, our physics teacher was obliging the students to attend in her extra-curriculum classes, was getting high amount of money and they were getting best grades. The remembrance of this memory annoys me even now. Thus, support of this statement results prejudiced judgements.
At the end, teachers are ones who share their knowledge with students without any anticipation except observing their triumphs on their lives. Some people believe teachers should be paid based on their achievements but others ignore this idea and see it a great unfair toward both sides. I personally, support the second opinion due to general and moral reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the students') or simply say ''Most students''.
Suggestion: Most of the students; Most students
... the life and future of their students. Most of students found the basis of their lives and ethi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 658, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...udents is not the teacher's fault. Some of the students do not study at all or some of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...re evaluated through grades and skills. These kind of pointless prospects decrease the qua...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'in contrast', 'kind of', 'sort of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261811023622 0.229887763892 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.141732283465 0.158761421928 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100393700787 0.0866891130778 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0354330708661 0.046263068375 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0688976377953 0.0685040099705 101% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112204724409 0.118717715034 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0354330708661 0.0351676179071 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82503615921 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0196850393701 0.0309702414327 64% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0846456692913 0.0887237588012 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00787401574803 0.0209618222197 38% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00984251968504 0.0139019557991 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2815.0 2387.08602151 118% => OK
No of words: 453.0 408.028673835 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.21412803532 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.386313465784 0.338922669872 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.302428256071 0.251872472559 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.23178807947 0.174417080927 133% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136865342163 0.112833075102 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82503615921 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53642384106 0.524397521467 102% => OK
Word variations: 63.0635913494 59.2087087015 107% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 18.875 20.5533526081 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7125681721 48.84282405 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.291666667 120.699889404 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.5533526081 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.541666666667 0.644075263715 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 49.1178256071 45.7405998639 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.664 1.45489161554 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328645724684 0.300154397459 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0745075963216 0.103427244359 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0685323295285 0.0752933317313 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.435692830035 0.497263757937 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146706962524 0.151897553556 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11435735576 0.114077575197 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062043842615 0.0781384742642 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.400317262179 0.336927656856 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.124386688663 0.067059652881 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242529851165 0.210909579961 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352438536525 0.0618886996521 57% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.86379928315 259% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 2.4623655914 325% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.