Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Although it is generally believed that teachers share their life experience with their students, the question remains to what extent their social and political ideas should be known to students. In this respect, some people think that those views should be concealed from students. Meanwhile, many others argue that professors' ideas on social and political matters are important for students to know. Personally, I am prone to believe that the views under consideration may be conveyed to students. I hold this position for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, students are expected to have knowledge not only on their disciplines, but also on social-political issues. This is due to the fact that education at universities and high-schools precedes the adult life, when young people have to understand broader issues in order to succeed. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Thus, when I graduated from the university and received a job in a legal company, I had to communicate with clients not only in terms of professional matters, but also in a broader sense. So, thanks to my previous education and my professors' approach to let us know broader political and social issues, I succeeded in my legal career in the mentioned legal company.
Also, our tutors' willingness to share with us their attitudes contribute to the development of our disputing abilities. In my view, it is very important to stimulate students to discuss various questions during the classes. Consequently, when that kind of discussion takes place, students learn how to develop an approach, how to support it, and so on. For instance, my professor of history was always sharing with us her opinion on the historical issues, and specifically on the matters related to politics. As a result, we were arguing with each other and learned a lot of useful skills.
To sum up briefly, it is a fact that the primary function of educational institutions is to give knowledge on the taught subjects. At the same time, tutors' personal views are very useful, too. Its explanation is twofold: first, students become better prepared for their future careers, and, second, it helps learners develop important abilities and skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | naziii | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | shrijan | 73 | view |
- TPO 37 Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TOEFL integrated writing: Chevalier de Seingalt 90
- TPO 8 - Integrated task 3
- This material addresses the question of whether the researchers found actual tissues of Tyrannosaurus rex. The reading passage suggests three arguments to support the view that the leg bone of the dinosaur contained remains of blood vessels, red blood cel 76
- tpo 50Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, thus, while, for instance, kind of, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11141304348 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89943360082 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573369565217 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9909234754 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219953214673 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622796421561 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051235100047 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118820481767 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050612410561 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.