Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

With the increasing emphasis on education, people's attitude towards teachers is constantly changing. There are questions as to whether advisors were more appreciated and valued by society than they are nowadays, some deem that it is true while others have negative attitudes. From a personal point of view, the above statement is disagreeable because of some reasons as below.
First of all, teachers now with professional backgrounds and profound knowledge deserve more appreciation as well as attention. To be more specific, whether in college or high school, it is easy to detect a number of high-quality tutors who not only graduated from excellent normal universities but also have specialized subject skills. With the abilities mentioned above, it is convincing that instructors could educate numerous brilliant students and gain achievements in their positions. As a result, advisors should receive more gratitude and attention since they make a great contribution to education along with their outstanding accomplishments. While in the past, teachers who taught at schools barely possessed comprehensive knowledge because they did not have an opportunity to accept professional training. Under these circumstances, the information they could instruct their pupils was also extremely limited so that it is difficult for them to be valued and appreciated by the whole society. Therefore, the community at present attaches more importance to instructors than before.
What is more, with the high emphasis of education in the whole nation, tutors should equally receive more concerns. It is widely acknowledged that the competition between countries in the future would be mainly for high-technology talents. In this case, more states now are willing to invest in schools to cultivate native experts. Counselors, as the most important part of a school, are particularly supported and cared for by the country. For example, due to the attention of the society to tutors, their salaries have been greatly increased in many areas, which also means that their social status has constantly improved. Moreover, Teachers' Day is on September 10th. People would celebrate this holiday and express their appreciation to the instructors who have worked so hard to give them guidance when they were young. Hence, the nation gives much encouragement to the tutors who have made great contributions to education.
Lastly, in the past, when the productivity was relatively low, teachers would not be able to obtain enough attention. A lot of children would join the work instead of going to school because their families were too poor to pay their tuition fees. From what was discussed above, education was neglected by many parents who would not listen to the opinions from advisors as well. Therefore, counselors were less valued by the nation in the past.
To sum up, from what has been discussed above, in modern society tutors would get more appreciation and attention than they were in the last century since both the country and themselves have contributed a lot of value to the education area.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...onstantly changing. There are questions as to whether advisors were more appreciated and valu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, as a result, as well as, first of all, it is true, to sum up, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2609.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34631147541 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94178303804 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 809.1 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5172748112 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.434782609 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2173913043 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.34782608696 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22082850672 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653911880058 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503413079839 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142665590907 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563366446249 0.0645574589148 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.