Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
During history, teachers have had a momentous issue in the community, and it goes without saying that they should be in welfare. Nowadays, because the knowledge changes to a critical issue in the life of people, teachers should pay more attention to it than the past. To achieve this, they must have a comfortable situation in their life and workplace. It's crystal clear that the people are in a better position than past, and in what follows, I will substantiate my claims about it.
First of all, teachers have more welfare than the past in their class, and many tools are given them for teaching, such as projectors, laptops, whiteboards, and so forth. For example, I was a student sixteen years ago. By that time, teachers were not in excellent comfort because there were just a few teachers in my school, and they should teach from morning until evening for both elementary and advanced students. But, now there are many teachers in schools, which causes teachers to be home in the afternoon to take a little nap. Thus, not only hiring many teachers causes an increase in the number of employed people, but it also brings about much welfare for teachers.
Secondly, teachers have many institutions for their rights. So, if there is a protest for their rights, these institutions could organize the teachers, and by this, their letter will reach to governments and parliament's representatives. Last year, the government did not increase teachers' salary, for instance. So they decided to accumulate in front of the parliament and showed their opposite about this decision. But, this could not be successful without a powerful institution. Their institution collected teachers signatures, and representatives had to prevent the government from keeping teachers' salary constant. Therefore, they can take their rights from politics and cease them from illegal decisions.
To conclude, even though the comfort of teachers can improve in the future, now they are valued by the community than they were in the past.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10876132931 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74288963707 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543806646526 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8660741662 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4705882353 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165430097199 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576633729272 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054691246319 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129982950662 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563926846432 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.