Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
From a general point of view, some specific occupations were valued and praised in particular period and be forgotten later. Some people keep endorsing the fact that teacher are now praised and respected than past whereas others dismiss this idea. Personally, it is my firm conviction that, nowadays, teachers have received less respect than past and they have been forgotten some how in my society. In what follows, I will thoroughly elucidate on what rationales my viewpoint is based on.
The first and foremost reason is that teachers are among the low paid employees in the society. Generally, it is an indisputable fact that the more an occupation is valued, the more salary it should be paid. Although, teaching is a precious job, however it is virtually very tough and arduous, specially in elementary schools which pupil are younger. Therefore, the society should appreciate teachers more than what they do now and government have to show it's respect by paying a satisfying salary to teachers. Personally, I have encountered individuals who were teacher, however, because of insufficient salary that they obtain they had planned to quit this job or, at least, find a secondary job to fulfill their family ordinary demand.
Secondly, in todays world less individual are willing to choose to be a teacher. Conclusively, this unwillingness that is prevail among youth clearly demonstrate that this job is receiving lees respect and value among the society. My own experience is a compelling example that endorse my assertation. A few years ago, I worked as an academic adviser in a high school. Since I was in close contact with students and give advice to them for their future occupation, I could distinguish which jobs are more popular among pupil and which are less wanted and appreciated. Therefore, I came to conclusion that less students were willing to become teacher and their assessment of this precious job was disappointing. Unfortunately, they assumed that this job is not well-paid and does not bring about high social acceptance. It can be inferred that the whole society has disgraced teaching which has yield in such results through younger citizens that are responsible for the future prosperity of their country.
To put in a nutshell, teachers are not praised and respected as much as they deserve and they demand more acceptance and value. I cling to this viewpoint owing to the fact that they have been, basically, paid unsatisfied salary which has imposed them to try work in secondary jobs beside. Also, less people are eager to become teacher these days and they show more enthusiasm for other occupations rather than teaching.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: SOME_HOW
Message: Did you mean 'somehow'?
... than past and they have been forgotten some how in my society. In what follows, I will ...
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prevailed'.
...onclusively, this unwillingness that is prevail among youth clearly demonstrate that th...
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun students is countable.
...d. Therefore, I came to conclusion that less students were willing to become teacher...
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...f their country. To put in a nutshell, teachers are not praised and respected a...
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
...ry work in secondary jobs beside. Also, less people are eager to become teacher thes...
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: EAGER_TO
Message: With 'eager to', use the base form of the verb: 'become'.
... beside. Also, less people are eager to become teacher these days and they show more e...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, at least, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2224.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08924485126 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79281032199 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.249969697 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.85 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215465292985 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634918083242 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581869841215 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140611876266 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386358083633 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.