Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People are having a hard time reaching a consensus on whether by using technology, children are less productive or not than in past times. Some people hold conflicting views. As far as I am concerned, I firmly believe that it makes more creative, more thoughtful than before. There are many reasons that support my point of view, and I would explore a few of them, the most important ones here.
The primary reason we have to consider is that we now know every sector of knowledge and get everything easily. It is generally believed that it was unlikely to know and rare to find any materials. To be more exact, the resources are not available, not advanced, and very expensive to purchase. My own experience is more compelling evidence for it. When I was in class six, many children used computers. But, it took a lot of money and did not do many things due to limited resources. As a result, though they had potential talent, they did not contribute more enough. Now, it is commonly admissible that buying a computer is easier, and there are a lot of tutorial videos where they can learn anything. Therefore, children are more creative at present, and it is apparent that they can make any robotics at the age of class six. However, having said this, children are more advanced to create any scientific tools.
The second point that comes to mind is that the world is too competitive, and parents want their children to involve various programs. For instance, my student is a student of class seven. He participated in a scientific competition last year. He made a cycle that consisted of bamboo. The primary purpose of this project is to reduce the greenhouse by diminishing fuel energy. I was wondering and surprised that how he made it without anyone's help. In contrast, in that time, I wasted my time doing nothing and, indeed, I would never conceive or make it.
Finally, given the above factors, I may conclude that children are more active in making robots and more enthusiastic engaging in many programs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73863636364 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65410858018 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4845799401 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8181818182 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138905712982 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347029723364 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368847215303 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765945484869 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416936198565 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.