Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's hectic life, Children have different innate talents, and as they grow, they show their creativity. Some people claim that in the past children were more creative. Controversy exists over whether, some people assert that with the advent of different technologies children have more chances to be creative. In my vantage point, nowadays children are more creative in comparison to the past because not only do their parents have more free time with the help of new technologies, but also new technologies have provided desirable conditions for children to progress their innate talents.
One of the primary causes is that these parents have more free time, and they can allocate this free time to their children and find their inherent talents. Parents are the first instructors of children, and they play a pivotal role in their education. In addition, children need their parents' help to find their innate abilities and develop them. In the past, people were preoccupied with their activities, and they did have enough to educate their children. However, nowadays by the manifestation of new technologies, they have the opportunity to assign more time to their children. The arrival of the internet has eased some work, and people can do a lot of their activities with the help of the internet. For example, some parents do not need to go to offices, and they can work at home. Similarly, they can buy their needs online, and they do not need to go shopping. As a result, they allocate this time to their children and help them find their innate talents. Different children have distinctive talents, and they need some stimulant to bloom these innate abilities. When parents have more free time, they can play with them and diagnose their talents.
There is another factor that deserves some words here. Nowadays children have a lot of facilities that help them develop their inherent abilities. These technologies motivate children to show their abilities and progress them. There are various professional video games, and children are attracted to them. For instance, there is a video game in that children can play piano on their iPads, and they have the opportunity to be familiar with different notes. Then, they are more prepared for the future. In addition, there are different classrooms that children can enroll in them. Nowadays professional instructors can prepare children and teach them. However, children in the past did not have these opportunities, and they showed their talents occasionally. These days children can simulate different activities with the help of new technologies. For example, they can construct a building with some toys, and they have this opportunity to implement innovative methods in these activities. As a result, these technologies motivate their inborn abilities and help them progress.
All in all, nowadays with the help of new technologies, parents can assign more time to their children and help them find their innate talents. In addition, new technologies facilitate the development of children’s abilities, and children can progress their talents with the help of new technologies. Therefore, these days children have more opportunities to be creative in comparison to the past. It is predictable that as time goes on, children would be more creative, and modern technologies would give them more chances to reveal their talents.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, similarly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2854.0 1977.66487455 144% => OK
No of words: 546.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22710622711 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83390555256 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76987511158 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.340659340659 0.524837075471 65% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 877.5 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 15.0 1.86738351254 803% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4245311586 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.064516129 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6129032258 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.67741935484 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 25.0 11.8709677419 211% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157170651401 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679549190335 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03240104896 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130511842324 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214049819025 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.