Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
There is never a good reason to be impolite (rude) to other people.
Most people live in the recent society are educated by teachers in school or in home. They are taught how to be a polite people to others. Even though sometimes someone would be angry to others due to some reasons and be rude to others, there exist some reasonable reasons. Personally, I believe that it is not never a good reason to explain the situation in terms of different scenarios.
To begin with, there are a lot of situations people need to be polite to others. In the class, teachers and students all should be polite to each other, which can create a kind of harmonious atmosphere in the class. It not only is capable of improving the relationship between teachers and students, but boost the efficiency of study because of sense of comfort. For example, in a polite class, teachers are able to answer students’ question in detail and carefully so that students are able to absorb knowledge quickly. What’s more, people also ought to be polite in subways or buses by using respective words to others, which can allow all people to be convenient. For instance, on the buses, if asking some young people to offer their seats to older people via polite mood, people who are inconvenient like pregnancy or older people are able to get seats easily even obtaining others’ care. But if they use some rude word force young people get away from their seats, young people are likely to argue with them even fighting, which will cause heave atmosphere in the bus.
Additionally, in some other cases, people don’t have to keep polite to some peculiar people like thieves. If you on the bus and see a chief is stealing, you must keep the chief from stealing. And at that time, you can allow yourself to be impolite to the chief. the chief will not be careful if you are polite to him because he will believe that you don’t have brave to control and grasp him. Another situation is in fire. Some people in order to prevent their asset from fire at expense of their life. And at that moment, people should drag them out from fire by rude action instead of only be polite due to the fact that at that emergency, most people will be foolhardy so that polite action is unlikely to restrain them. These two situations both can provide a reasonable reason to be impolite to others.
Conclusion, it is exceedingly important to know the timing to be polite or impolite because there are a mount factors having to be considered due to different validity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation in terms of different scenarios. To begin with, there are a lot of situat...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill cause heave atmosphere in the bus. Additionally, in some other cases, peopl...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...w yourself to be impolite to the chief. the chief will not be careful if you are po...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nable reason to be impolite to others. Conclusion, it is exceedingly important ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, for instance, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63990825688 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44130987337 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470183486239 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8618115765 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.15 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285151212608 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936604290688 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549068754831 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183081094525 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584149291448 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.