Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
In our modern era, people have to do various tasks during the day. While some people prefer to speed up their workings and risk the probable consequences, others believe that working in a steady pace and give a deeper consideration to the ongoing options is a more rational approach. I, personally, concur with the latter group's opinion. The reasons substantiating my standpoint are elaborated hereunder.
To begin with, functioning different works in a faster pace might lead to successive failures, thereby intensifying the amount of tensions people facing nowadays. To be more specific, in the present day, individuals are under a huge amount of pressure in their daily life. For instance, employers have to tackle a heavy workload at their working environment. Students are overwhelmed by their busy educational programs, forcing them to experience an intense stress. It is crystal clear that although the amount of their duties is stepping into an upward trend, sacrifising the precision of their moves to do their affairs does not seem rational. When they try to making things done in a shorter amount of time, not only does it lower their concentration but also it will cause successive setbacks, which can generates even more stress for them. Under such circumstances, they have to redo the whole process which would be much more draining than if they have give their actions a second thought in the first place.
Secondly, sometimes the repercussions of making mistakes due to performing quickly are not reversible. To put this into a more vivid picture, in today's competitive world, everyone strives to set themselves apart from the crowd by showing their high potential in their area of profession. However, carrying out their tasks in a rush, individuals might encounter consequences they cannot reverse. As a result, a high-quality, steady-pace performance is much more promising for a future success. For instance, given a duty in workplace, an accountant might make a irrecoverable mistake in losing some important statistics through his rush and imprecise calculation. Consequently, it is highly probable that his boss does not give him a second chance and fires him because he can be replaced by myriads of other qualified candidates for the same positions he was working.
To sum up, considering all the reasons and points into account, once could conclude that in today's world it is more crucial to work slowly and accurately. It is because working in a rush can lead to repetitive failures and increase the daily stress and because sometimes people might not have the chance to make up for their mistakes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 809, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'generate'
Suggestion: generate
...ll cause successive setbacks, which can generates even more stress for them. Under such c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 560, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... in workplace, an accountant might make a irrecoverable mistake in losing some im...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, for instance, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2207.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15654205607 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91304359693 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579439252336 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5355254764 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.157894737 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5263157895 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182781287439 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553446651187 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047619233445 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121854503958 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301342010245 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.