Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People have differing views regard to the learning about a country. while some argue that there are more ways instead of visiting for learning, I believe that visiting is more effective way for this goal.
The first reason is that museums always paly a significant role in education or could be seen as a deucational tool. Museums are often exhibit a collection of intersting objects that visitors want to see and educate some information about those objects that people have never seen before. So, it is more important that museums peresent history of the host country. For this purpose, museums' crater could employ professional guides to talk about exhibits and give visitors those information they want or answer their question they ask, or offer headsets that paly educational content to the visitors. Finally, these cultural and historical attractions could serve to educate people and act as a landmark or talking point about host country's history.
However, some argue that there are effective ways to learn about a country. They propose internet or documentry films that have more information about the country. In contrast, I think it is a shortshighted view. These options niether have direct interaction nor have opportunities to ask a question as well as see objects as a form of live. Take France as an example, people often go to this country to see places like Eiffel Tower or Louvre museum. Eiffel Tower provides detailed things that are useful for engineers and could learn many thinks related to the construction. On the other hand, Louvre museum provides information related to the nation's cultural heritage, history, customs and belives. As a result, I think those options that imply in the first paragraph are poor substitude for learning about a country.
In conclusion, although there are other ways to learn about a country, I strongly support the idea that visiting museums are best option for learing about the country because not only could provide detailed information about the country, but also there may be not appropriate alternative for this peurpose.
time 30 min
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...regard to the learning about a country. while some argue that there are more ways ins...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...o talk about exhibits and give visitors those information they want or answer their question they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the best'.
Suggestion: are the best
... support the idea that visiting museums are best option for learing about the country be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Time
...riate alternative for this peurpose. time 30 min
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15160349854 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64972718456 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507288629738 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0533021463 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.941176471 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19350791617 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619095082825 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491956764316 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137922587776 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395970515996 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.