Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's modern world, communication plays a crucial role in every society. every day, individuals are in touch with different people including classmates, colleagues, managers, and so forth through different ways such as e-mail, letter, and face-to-face communication to name but a few. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among people about what is the best way of transferring information. Some people believe that modern technology pave the way for conveying knowledge, so individuals should make the most of technology to eliminate time consuming approaches such as meeting in person. other, however, advocate the idea that it is essential to communicate about an important project in person. I personally, concur with the latter. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most important reasons.
To begin with, face-to face communication causes people to convey their opinion in the best way without any mistake. Sometimes, people cannot transmit their exact purposes through e-mail. using e-mail maybe cause disastrous mistakes in conveying information which takes a long time to revise them, as opposed to a situation when you can explain your meaning down to the small details in person. For example, I can recall when I was a civil engineering major. I mailed my supervisor and asked him a question about my dissertation. he responded me promptly but I could not found out his explanation. therefore, I decided to go to her office and ask my question in person. After he explained the concept to me, I figured out that I had misunderstood his purpose. Had I not went to see him and asked my question by face-to-face communication, I would have continued my thesis erroneously that its correction was very arduous.
Secondly, people can provide their colleagues with more information in person rather than through e-mail. Not only does face-to-face communication prevent from egregious mistakes, but it provide conveying a great deal of information as well. people often do not spend a lot of time to explain through their e-mail content because it is a boring and time consuming process and maybe informal. they describe key points and prevent giving extra information. therefore, it maybe need several e-mails to understand each other and solve the problem, while communicating in person could obviate need for other appointments. this clearly demonstrates that face-to-face appointments are much better than using technology to convey your meaning.
All in all, I really believe that individuals should use in person communications for their important projects on the ground that they can inhibit troubles and provide more details. Hence, should people allocate a time to face-to-face communication, they will produce a better work for their projects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Every
... plays a crucial role in every society. every day, individuals are in touch with diff...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 608, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
...g approaches such as meeting in person. other, however, advocate the idea that it is ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Using
...it their exact purposes through e-mail. using e-mail maybe cause disastrous mistakes ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...d him a question about my dissertation. he responded me promptly but I could not f...
^^
Line 5, column 599, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... I could not found out his explanation. therefore, I decided to go to her office and ask ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 923, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y that its correction was very arduous. Secondly, people can provide their colle...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 188, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...prevent from egregious mistakes, but it provide conveying a great deal of information a...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ng a great deal of information as well. people often do not spend a lot of time to exp...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 393, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...e consuming process and maybe informal. they describe key points and prevent giving ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 456, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...s and prevent giving extra information. therefore, it maybe need several e-mails to under...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 476, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'needs'?
Suggestion: needs
... extra information. therefore, it maybe need several e-mails to understand each othe...
^^^^
Line 9, column 618, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ld obviate need for other appointments. this clearly demonstrates that face-to-face ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36281179138 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08249267598 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2363912388 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5416666667 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95833333333 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216813349709 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591731213333 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452519975808 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142596781072 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375055435751 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.