Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.

Today, people have to communicate with each other due to their needs and their lifestyle, more than in the past. Technology has made it easier to people to communicate. However, some people believe it is better to communicate about their projects and work issues in person. I, personally, am of the opinion that it is better to communicate about a project in person. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explain in the following paragraphs.

First of all, by communicating in person, people can prevent wasting time. If people want to send an e-mail about a project, they have to spend an amount of time writing an e-mail and wait for a response. Since others may have other projects and will not be able to answer as soon as possible, so it causes others to waste their time. Moreover, students and colleagues may face internet problems, which is not inevitable. In contrast, by communicating in person, all members can communicate readily, as all members of the project have attendance. For example, my classmates and I had to prepare a presentation for our biology class. We decided to discuss the presentation by e-mail, but always one of the members had a problem attending the meeting, and we all waste most of our time waiting for others' responses. Subsequently, we could not meet the deadline and got a good grade.

Secondly, communicating in person can help to discuss beneficially. Had people communicate in person, they can express their ideas delicately. Plus, it is helpful to prevent any misunderstanding. Approximately, by sending e-mail, we can not explain our idea in detail because it is difficult to write everything are in our mind. For instance, about the presentation which I mentioned before, first, we were communicating with each other by e-mail, so we were faced with misconceptions. In the end, we decided to speak in person bout our assignment. Undoubtedly, we could solve all misconceptions and prepare an accurate presentation.

To sum everything up, I, definitely, believe that if people communicate about a project in person, they will prepare better work. This is because, they can prevent wasting time and finish it on time, and they can express their ideas and information in an accurate way, which is effective to the quality of their project.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an accurate way" with adverb for "accurate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...can express their ideas and information in an accurate way, which is effective to the quality of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i feel, in contrast, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98177083333 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03969395039 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2637918742 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9545454545 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4545454545 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292592237435 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945697741104 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878610337605 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205264865965 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049981596124 0.0645574589148 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.