Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
In this today's world, thanks to technological breakthroughs and cutting-edge innovations in every aspect of science, the way of communication has altered dramatically. In this line of thought, some people are of the opinion that e-mails are a reasonable method for communication. In contrast, I personally subscribe to the view that colleagues should speak with each other in person to address a problem. In the following paragraphs, my reasons will be elaborated on this issue in more detail.
To begin with, there is no secret to the fact that people with face to face communication can better convince each other. generally speaking, a variety of gestures aid to this point. To put it in other words, the more feeling or emotions people spend on one issue, the more benefits they can gain. To delve more into it, take below situation as an example. when colleagues want to disprove others’ work, or when they have critical points of view, they indicate it with their sorry face, or with depicting an apology to the eyes. it will be much more convincing if the colleague realizes the feeling in the face.
another reason is that group working plays a crucial role in the progress of the project; people can understand the group efforts when they speak one another in person. In fact, when individuals watch other attempts in the situation of group working, they tend to work better. The atmosphere influences each member to be more productive. However, when they have meeting in the social media or send their duties of a project in e-mail, they cannot notice how others work hard or dedicate time to complete it. my personal experience is a compelling example of this. when I worked with my classmates living in dormitory in a group, our meetings encourage us to finish our work sooner than other groups which did not access their members in person.
Drawing upon the reasons that I mentioned above, although there are several exceptions excluded from general rules, I believe that individuals should communicate about a practice in person. Not only can they show their emotions which help others know their attempt is important, but it also motivates members to work harder.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... a reasonable method for communication. In contrast, I personally subscribe to the...
^^
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...h other in person to address a problem. In the following paragraphs, my reasons wi...
^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Generally
...ication can better convince each other. generally speaking, a variety of gestures aid to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...it, take below situation as an example. when colleagues want to disprove others’ wor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... with depicting an apology to the eyes. it will be much more convincing if the col...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...ue realizes the feeling in the face. another reason is that group working plays a cr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...rience is a compelling example of this. when I worked with my classmates living in d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, in contrast, in fact, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96730245232 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71459398147 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569482288828 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9196814078 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.277777778 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273314447338 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771020369304 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558792215282 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14983156085 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508759984846 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.