Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
The development of our society raises a higher demand for working collaboratively, and people expect that they can communicate with their teammates more efficiently. Some people prefer discussing face to face, while I think it is more efficient and productive to use e-mail.
To begin with, discussing face to face can be somehow too inconvenient. Difficulty already lies in commuting a long distance to attend a group meeting in the past, especially for those big companies. Nowadays, with the covid-19 situation evolved and intensified around the world, it is much harder and more dangerous for people to get together. The facts that countless airlines have been cancelled, abundant cities are still in lockdown, and a large number of people are in quarantine suggest that it is even impossible to gather together. With e-mail, on the other hand, everyone can get in touch with others just with one click. My experience can serve as an example to illustrate that. There was one research project that we put entire effort on. However, when it was about to finish, the pandemic started and it interrupted the entire workflow. We used to discuss in person, and this sudden change really drove us crazy and we didn’t know what to do. By switching to e-mail, we surprisingly found that we were still able to, even more efficiently, share our ideas. It is the e-mail that kept our project alive and we finally made it in due time.
Moreover, it is more time-saving to discuss through e-mail. Considerable people have already been occupied with heavy work and family burdens. Especially for those who just graduated, they have to spend extra time getting familiar with the work content, dealing with housing problems, and maintaining the relationship with their lovers, which result in a relatively tight schedule. If they are required to attend a meeting now and then, it will take them additional time, which may not be able to find a vacant slot in their fully arranged schedule. Besides, it is often the case that not all teammates are required for every discussion. Nevertheless, with e-mail, people will think carefully about who should join in the discussion and who just needs a notification. It will actually make team members more productive.
Admittedly, it is more likely to can get an immediate response when talking face to face. Yet, an immediate response may not always be the correct one, since people tend to make mistakes when they speak without a second thought. On the contrary, e-mail enables us to consider every detail thoroughly to finally conclude a really helpful response. Only in this way, a better work will be produced.
In conclusion, I believe that an excellent result will be yielded when team members communicate with others by e-mail instead of in person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ndant cities are still in lockdown, and a large number of people are in quarantine suggest that i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, finally, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, second, so, still, then, while, i think, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02795698925 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73446589566 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544086021505 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1354527452 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.52 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.32 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218133312835 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583119556646 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390738341532 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130146077756 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031541458297 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.