Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.

It goes without saying that communicating to people plays a crucial role in every individual's life. Nowadays people have several ways to communicate to others and some students prefer to work on a shared project with their classmates via e-mail; however, some others prefer face to face communicating about their projects. In my opinion, I stand for this view that communicating in person is more beneficial. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

First, talking face-to-face lets people express their emotions which is not possible to show feelings in e-mail. Therefore people can understand the meaning of people's words and do not misinterprate. For exapmle, the students might think their classmates are aggressive while reading his e-mail, however, the letter has not been written by an angry student. When people can express their feelings, they can establish an emotional bond together and become friends. In fact, communicating different people can provide a lot of benefits. For example, I have received many job offers by the people who I had make a communication with.

Second, people can enhance their social skills by communicating their colleagues or classmates, because they can express their ideas and discuss a particular subject with other people. Moreover, the people can see other's perspectives and opinions which can make a bond each other. For example, when I was a student at school, I had to give a presentation with my friends and we had a lot of disagreements with each other. By discussing and expressing our ideas, we could finally decide on the topic for our projects. All of us learnt how to discuss and convince others.

In conclusion, some people like to communicate people by sending emails, I would prefer to make a communication in person. Not only do not people have misinterpretation, but also they increase their social skills.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...to people plays a crucial role in every individuals life. Nowadays people have several ways...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ot possible to show feelings in e-mail. Therefore people can understand the meaning of pe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'made'.
Suggestion: made
...many job offers by the people who I had make a communication with. Second, people...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13461538462 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97592658734 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.846895103 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2352941176 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193632126374 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626806071306 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426138726265 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12758021184 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531034490029 0.0645574589148 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.