Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A zoo has no useful purpose. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer.
It is a widely supported controversy whether a zoo has hardly useful goals or not. Some people think that zoos have little impact on the safety of animal's life. They also have a common belief that zoos are barely related to the benifical sides of human. Despite it, I am prone to say that the significance of a zoo outnumbers the negative consequences to the societies. My next sentences will explore the reasons why zoos are playing an important role in the communities.
First and foremost, zoo is a great source of learning since we can closely observe the animals here. Sometimes, students of medical science and biology cannot comprehend the characteristics of many animals and microorganism, but if they can completely find out their theoretical applications among the animals of a zoo. Moreover, kids are very enthusiastic about the pet, therefore, many zoos have a specific arena so that children can touch some pets such as, dogs, tortoise, and to name a few.
Secondly, the zoos are a good place for passing some happy moments, for instance, many couples or families pass their holidays at a zoo. As a result, their children get the scope of learning about animals which helps to flourish their physical accretion. Furthermore, the most important sides of a zoo is that it provides a habitat for the extinct animals. The wild lives of these are going on the way to the destruction due to deforestation. Thus, zoos are helping to recover the ecological imbalances.
Furthermore, there are many zoos who are working to ensure healthy offspring thus they are providing necessary injections, and these zoos are allowing the researchers to find out the dangerous viruses. So, it will be very easier for the scientists to analyze the intricate fields for living of animals, and they can be properly used by the human.
In conclusion, a zoo is the habitat for animals where they can find out the natural environments of a forest. The aforesaid, reasons always inspire me to support for having the zoos and improving them. A Government should have a closer look to the development of the zoos of a country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91364902507 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8579712976 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557103064067 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2393605568 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123306839082 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437345812908 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027276118675 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754732922363 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260737617829 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.