do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
good teachers set challenging tasks for their students.
There might be many teachers who believe that students should be faced with
challenges that are in accordance with their book level. I strongly disagree and I
reckon that students should be confronted with more challenges in their school time
due to the reasons below: First, By more challenging tasks, their abilities to thinking
ciritically will be promoted. Second, they can improve their social skills. And finally,
they can be ready for the future.
First, By the help of more challenging tasks, their critical thinking will be promoted
tremendously. When students are pushed to do harder tasks, they have to open their
eyes more widely to see the different aspects and angels of an issue in order to be
able to solve a problem. I used to be a physics teacher. In order to teach the concept
of speed directly to my 7th grade students, instead of giving them the equation, I took
them to the lab and gave them some tools and asked them to design an experiment
that can measure the speed of an object , which is a lot more complicated. Besides, a
good conceptual task will put students in different real-life situation which can help
them make real decisions.
Next, in order to overcome the obstacle that the challenge has provided them, they
have to get help from each other and therefore, this can undeniably help them
promote their social skills. They have to be able to work in groups in order to find
solutions to problems. working in a group can help them learn how to build
relationships with one another and how to communicate and hear different and
opposing points of view. Group work can motivate them and help them develop both
interpersonal and intrapersonal skills. In the example that I provided above, you can
vividly observe how working in groups in order to come up with an experiment can help
them with their social skills.
Finally, Challenge at school can prepare them for future life. I am not talking about
only academic situations at university where they have to use their competence and
knowledge to solve a problem, What I mean more significantly is how to help them
grow into individuals who can use critical thinking to find solutions in their real life and
overcome obstacles by the help of the skills they have learned throughout the school
years and not just by a couple of equations they have memorized and used for solving
abstract problems.
In conclusion, I believe that in order to have individuals that can take a deeper look at
the problems they are faced with throughout their lives , we have to nurture students at
school in a way that they can actually learn life skills real just a couple of subjects by
exposing them to more challenging tasks and situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... that can measure the speed of an object , which is a lot more complicated. Beside...
^^
Line 19, column 24, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Working
...n order to find solutions to problems. working in a group can help them learn how to b...
^^^^^^^
Line 33, column 56, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ey are faced with throughout their lives , we have to nurture students at school ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, finally, first, if, look, second, so, therefore, i mean, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2298.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88936170213 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61846236548 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446808510638 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.364304938 48.9658058833 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.176470588 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6470588235 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 34.0 4.53405017921 750% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163776078999 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662933634591 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451156873926 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505574148224 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050581825416 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.