Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
1）Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
2）Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
3）Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without a doubt, it is a very controversial question whether you will correct wrong information given by teacher or boss. In my humble opinion, I believe that it is better to correct the wrong information right away rather than waiting for the meeting or class discussion is over. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, teachers are the person who is responsible for nurturing and molding our future. They teach us with our lessons in school and motivate students to excel in their studies. As a student, we value and trust that the information given by our professors are accurate and concise. My personal experience is a compelling example of this, I am in my sophomore year we are discussing about photosynthesis in our science class. Moreover, our professor mentioned wrong information about it and I raise my hand and voice out my concern about the topic and told my professor that I read different information about photosynthesis and he is telling the wrong information. On the other hand, my professor immediately corrected the wrong information in the class and he taught us the right information. Our class learned a lot from this discussion because other students as well was very interested with the topic and enjoyed the discussion in class, that students can also share and correct the professor if wrong information is given. As a result, the discussion were much lively and informative.
Secondly, in school students are there to learn from their professor and gain knowledge. As a student it is unfair that wrong information and data will not be corrected by other people in class. For instance, when there is discussion in class and the professor gives information that is not factual or incorrect. Hence, the students will not learn from his teacher. Other students will just let wrong information pass by and correct the professor until the class is over because the students are afraid that the professor will think negatively with that student. In addition, student feels that his grades will be reduced for correcting his adviser. The whole class will suffer because they will not learn and they will instill in their minds wrong details taught by the professor.
To summarize, I believe that it is beneficial that teachers should be corrected immediately for giving wrong information to the class. This is because students will learn much better if professors give accurate and precise discussion in class.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, for instance, i feel, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00721153846 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79800980457 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432692307692 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4087795842 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.15 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0660107799469 0.236089414692 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0285373252587 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291935560051 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0593548252625 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048346894172 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.