Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It can be very convenient to have a car to take us everywhere, whenever we want. However, there are some drawbacks related to these vehicles that need to be considered. The question is about whether the number of cars will be less in twenty years than it is nowadays. From my perspective, I believe that there will be fewer cars due to the fact that they pollute the environment, owning a car can be really expensive and there is a limited space for the construction of new roads.
To begin with, cars are one the main sources of pollution nowadays. By the proccess of combustion, cars are responsible for throwing tons of cubic meters of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, which is noxious to the enviroment. Whenever I am coming to a big city like New York, for example, I can always see a layer of pollution over the city as I am approaching it by airplane. The effects of such accumulation of toxic material in the sky can be easily noticed in the climate changes over the past years: heat waves and snow storms are much more common nowadays.
Also, possessing a car is not cheap. If I had a car, I would have to spend money with insurance, fuel and manutenability of the machine. Furthermore, cars depreciate really fast over time, which makes them less valuable along the years. Today I live in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and I go everywhere by subway, bus or taxi. When I need to go far away I can always rent a car for the amount of days I need. By doing this, I am contributing to put one less car in the streets and this is much cheaper then owning my own car. Most of my friends do the same thing, thus this seems to be a tendency in big cities, thereby contributing to less dependency on a car.
Last but not least, countries have no infinit space to build new roads. I am originally from Recife, a coast city in the northeast of Brasil, and the traffic out there is extremely heavy. I used to be stuck in the traffic when I went to the university; it was not seldom that I took more than thirty minutes to cover a distance of 1 mile by car. One way to avoid this kind of situation without reducing the number of cars in the streets is by building new roads so that there are more routes to follow when the traffic is jammed. Conversely, there is not so many space to this kind of work. There are houses and protected areas in the way that cannot be easily blighted for such purpose. Therefore, if the number of cars increase, we will get to a point where there will be no more space for them.
In conclusion, due to the fact that cars are one of the greatest sources of air pollution, the costs needed to maintain a car are high and countries have limited space to build new roads, I posit that there will be fewer cars in next twenty years than there is nowadays. People should find alternatives for commuting from today on. This will make their lives easy and cheaper.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cheaper than'?
Suggestion: cheaper than
...ess car in the streets and this is much cheaper then owning my own car. Most of my friends d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...in the streets and this is much cheaper then owning my own car. Most of my friends d...
^^^^
Line 7, column 559, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun space seems to be countable; consider using: 'many spaces'.
Suggestion: many spaces
... is jammed. Conversely, there is not so many space to this kind of work. There are houses ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the greatest sources of air pollution, the costs needed to maintain a car are h...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, however, if, really, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2355.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 541.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35304990758 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52689484069 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478743068392 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1822580183 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.64 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221884277134 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627386490586 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564375960346 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137416834171 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617340740939 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.95 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.