Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As some people may hold a view that there will be more cars in use in the recent future; however, others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that the usages of cars will decrease in the next twenty years. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite reason which advocates my perspective is that the people will concern more about the environmental issue in the next twenty years. It is explicit as a crystal that whole global is tackling with the environmental issue, especially air pollution. Besides, they are planning to have a logical scheme to handle this serious situation, and these schemes and activities will aware the public too. As a result, people will be more meticulous about their surroundings, specifically about the air pollution. They will schedule to decline the human emission, and the personal car is one of the options which leads to these environmental issues. Consequently, the usage of public transportation system will replace instead of the personal cars.
The second case embraced my idea is that there is a negative or neutral population growth rate. There is a cogent statistic about the rate of population growth in all over the world, and the majority of these rates are negative or neutral. In this situation, the demand for the cars in the future will decrease or stand as it is now. According to the noteworthy, intelligible survey conducted in my country, the growth rate of palpitation in Iran is zero and there will be no any population increment in the future decades; in addition, according to another survey in Iran, there is a statistic of a car pre an individual in this country. Thus, there is no any extra requirement for new cars. That is how illustrates the number of cars will stay as identical as today.
The last indicator of my viewpoint's accuracy is that in the recent future there will be a better transportation system, which will be replaced with the personal cars. There is concrete evidence which the governments are persisted about these the traffic problems and there are looking for novel options to handle this chaotic situation. One of the options is an enhancement of the public transportation system such as the fast buses, or subways. In a comparison of the personal car usage, a subway is a sound option, which is fast, cheap, and easy. Hence, this condition impels the people to use the public transportation instead of their personal car. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the subject is my own example. I got used using my own car; however, after the subway service of city promotes, I completely incline on the subway for my transportation.
To wrap it up, based on aforementioned information one can logically draw the conclusion that in the recent future the rate of the car will be less than today. Since there will be especial scheme about air pollution, decrement in population growth and car demand, and better transportation facilities instead of the personal cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 474, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ation in Iran is zero and there will be no any population increment in the future ...
^^
Line 4, column 655, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ividual in this country. Thus, there is no any extra requirement for new cars. Tha...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'as to', 'in addition', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242268041237 0.229887763892 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.121993127148 0.158761421928 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0996563573883 0.0866891130778 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0343642611684 0.046263068375 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.03264604811 0.0685040099705 48% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118556701031 0.118717715034 100% => OK
Participles: 0.020618556701 0.0351676179071 59% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86602651721 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0189003436426 0.0309702414327 61% => OK
Particles: 0.00171821305842 0.00188951952338 91% => OK
Determiners: 0.14089347079 0.0887237588012 159% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.03264604811 0.0209618222197 156% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0137457044674 0.0139019557991 99% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3118.0 2387.08602151 131% => OK
No of words: 527.0 408.028673835 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9165085389 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48200974243 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.34724857685 0.338922669872 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.244781783681 0.251872472559 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184060721063 0.174417080927 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.121442125237 0.112833075102 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86602651721 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445920303605 0.524397521467 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.704624416 59.2087087015 87% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 21.9583333333 20.5533526081 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.740890701 48.84282405 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.916666667 120.699889404 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9583333333 20.5533526081 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.644075263715 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 46.4365117015 45.7405998639 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.01818181818 1.45489161554 139% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328751440563 0.300154397459 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.119590503679 0.103427244359 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0878342572158 0.0752933317313 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.5550455534 0.497263757937 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.136913839548 0.151897553556 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133122969995 0.114077575197 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679652462943 0.0781384742642 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.496110321201 0.336927656856 147% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0311268896627 0.067059652881 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252955007443 0.210909579961 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577839713642 0.0618886996521 93% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8870967742 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.91756272401 203% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.75985663082 254% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.