Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours
days and hours of working constitute a considerable proportion of one’s lifetime, so adjusting work time is important to reach higher productivity and wellbeing. I personally prefer working for three days a week for long hours, rather than working shorter hours for five days each week. I think that way for two major reasons which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs. First and foremost, working for three days a week leaves us with four days of compelete free time. one can devote that time to his family or try to participate in an informative or artistic class, improving his lifetime quality as a human being. As a personal experience, I remember a time when I had to work in order to afford my college tuition and make ends meet. In that time, my professor came up with two offers; one was working in the university library full day three days of the week, and other included working as an economic editor at a local newspaper five days a week for shorter hours. Although the latter was more prestigious and more in line with my major, I chose the former because of my productivity concerns. working for three days would enable me to spend the other four days on my college tasks and goals, while working in the morning for five times a week would suck my energy up and make me too tired to do anything important in the rest of the day. Second, every day of work demands commuting and warming up time, which can be avoided if we make up the fewer days of work with longer working ours each day. In that case, one would spend his working time more efficient and stop wasting time on unnecessary stuff. taking as an example, working five days a week means twelve ten of commuting, which obviously take a lot more time than six times of travelling as a result of three days working. taking account of unproductive time in starting each work day would worsen the problem. starting a work day in an office usually takes about half an hour greeting colleagues, discussing latest news, getting behind the desk and turn on the computer etc. By reducing the workdays and increasing the work hours, the proportion of productive time in each day will rise and that would help both employees and employers with less resource wasting and higher efficiency. In conclusion, I think of working longer hours for fewer days as a better option. This is because working that way results in obtaining more free time and also enables us to use our time more efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Days
days and hours of working constitute a consi...
^^^^
Line 1, column 483, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... with four days of compelete free time. one can devote that time to his family or t...
^^^
Line 1, column 1113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Working
...er because of my productivity concerns. working for three days would enable me to spend...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1622, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Taking
...stop wasting time on unnecessary stuff. taking as an example, working five days a week...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1801, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Taking
...ling as a result of three days working. taking account of unproductive time in startin...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1889, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Starting
...each work day would worsen the problem. starting a work day in an office usually takes a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1976, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'discussing the latest'.
Suggestion: discussing the latest
...about half an hour greeting colleagues, discussing latest news, getting behind the desk and turn ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63698630137 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53706803324 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486301369863 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.3851331223 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.470588235 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7647058824 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338494977639 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141654808308 0.076458572812 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109199286771 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338494977639 0.150856017488 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.