Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
It goes without saying that in this progressive world where we live, every individual has different ways to cope with his or her problems, among which enjoying in their jobs sounds to be one most conspicuous way. These days, there is a heated debate among people whether working five days in a regular hour or work just three days for long hours has a profound effect on the people in terms of their happiness during the job. Personally speaking, I firmly believe that it is essential for people to work just five days in regular hours to create an enjoyable time for themselves. To support my point of view, two significant reasons are being explored in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, it is crystal clear that the reason which has made the people enjoyable with working five days in a normal time lies behind the fact that they have an extra time to spend on their families every day. In this line of thought, it should be noted that human beings from all corners of the globe are striving to allocate some time with their family to reduce their stress. To put it simply, if the father of the family spends some time after the work with members of the family, he will not run into a huge problem and will not be overwhelmed by stress. Therefore, working every day with regular time is a major factor to reduce the pressure since they can create a better moment with your family. So, working three days with long hours has not considerable influence on the relationship with other members of the family, and as a result, it is possible to increase the stress in that life.
What is more, it is no secret to anyone that if someone works five days instead of three days, he or she receives a hoard of money, which means ones have a hoard of money and as a result, the enjoyment comes in his or her life. To be more specific, it is believed by many people that in the last decade, people have been looking for new ways to increase their money. In this regard, the more ones work for more time, the more can save some money, and the more have a better time in life. It is worth bearing in mind that not only money creat a better moment for every individual but also it needs to work very hard to earn more money. To put it into a more vivid picture, having compared my sister with my younger brother, a huge gap can be noticed in their lifestyle concerning the impact and influence of earning money in their life. While my sister works in a private company in three days with receiving a little money at the end of the month and she also has stressed to pay her way in life since she cannot save money. In contrast, my brother do some works in the public company which sponsored by government and he also has a lot of money, so he always is happy and enjoys his time with his friend. The difference makes it clear that it is essential for people to work with more hours and save money.
In conclusion, given the reasons mentioned, I firmly hold the view that working with five days and more hours has a positive effect on the people. This is because they can some money and spend more time with their family.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1154, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is always
...t and he also has a lot of money, so he always is happy and enjoys his time with his frie...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 52.1666666667 173% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2548.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 581.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38554216867 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90957651803 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2076128976 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426850258176 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 805.5 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4403769489 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.105263158 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5789473684 20.6045352989 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288990714796 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110832556013 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641139441962 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19501772287 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480190694067 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.