Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A great deal of attention has been attracted to the preference of people dealing with making new or saving old friends. There are a number of people who think that old friends must be saved forever, however, some others believe that making new friends are more exciting and rational. In my own perspective, I do believe that the first concept is more reasonable because of two main reasons which are elaborated in the following paragraphs.
First of all, old friends are not only a part of our lives but also our previous memories, they seem to be an alive memory, therefore, nobody wants to lose one part of his mind and previous life. In other words, some people make friends just in order to take advantage of them. In this regard, saving the old friend is meaningless. But, if we are in relationships with others for the sake of the good feeling of being together, leaving them and trying to make new ones has no reason at all. My own experience is an interesting example of this point. When I was studying at the University of New York, I had a roommate named Alex. He was the first boy whom I have met in the dormitory, as a result, we found numerous similarities to be best friends. We were always with each other and other students called us twins. The perfect part of our friendship is that we are still in contact and get really long with each other even though our university classes had finished. As a matter of fact, I do not want Alex just for its academic help, he is a part of my life or even my character and it is not possible for me to neglect these amount of memories.
Secondly, hidden features of people start to appear step by step. In fact, few people reveal all their goodness at the beginning of a relation. All human being are a little skeptical about the purpose of relationships, consequently, they try hard not to be recognized by others in order to prevent taking advantage of them. An experimental investigation was carried out in my own country to show whether people try to keep old friends or not. The results were surprisingly unbelievable, more than 85 percent of individuals, who take part in this survey, desire to protect their friends and avoid separation. The predominant reason for them was almost the same. They believe that by spending more time new features of friends, which were deliberately hidden, will be observed. After some years people be aware of the purpose of others and also know how to behave with each other. This shows the value of an old friend.
In sum, above from aforementioned explanation, I do prefer that saving old friends seems more logical in comparison with making new ones. This is just because of the effect of time which result in better understanding and also being a part of our personal lives. That's why we should protect our old relations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...lso being a part of our personal lives. Thats why we should protect our old relations...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61507936508 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64431057799 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509920634921 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9373028624 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.04 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.16 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.56 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199582765943 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606369261887 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509197894609 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147305171532 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507629261403 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.