Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that since the dawn of civilization, leaderships has played a pivotal role in diverse aspects of every society. In such a sophisticated world, where we are living, the importance of a proper leadership is increasing gradually, and it makes an undeniably important contribution to achievement of society. The controversial question which arises here is whether being a good leader is an inert talent or people can learn how to become an apt leader or manager. I personally contend that people can learn to be an excellent leader. In what follows, two elaborated reasons will vindicate my standpoints.
The first reason is that, as can be obviously felt, to have a successful society, company, institution, and administration the presence of a prominent leader or manager who can lead and manage these places is essential. Most leaders who are successful in their own positions have gathered invaluable and precious experiences over time during their career. They are more cognizant of diverse issues, problems and difficulties, so they have learned how to cope with these problems. They learn how to solve problems in an excellent manner and how to manage and lead in these situations. As a consequence, by passing time, they learn how to be a prominent leader, even they did not have any inert talent. For example, a leader of a country, a president, has a lot of experience during his career before becoming president, and he has learned a profuse amount of things during his career which will help him when he becomes president.
The second reason is that, as time passes and people become more developed, they become more aware of the role of an appropriate leader in their societies, and people prefer to have a well- educated leader who has enough and excellent knowledge about various aspects of society. Moreover, the educational system has evolved in an unexpected way, and universities not only provide diverse fields of study, but also they have specific major in this regard. On the other hand, in today's world, there are many amenities which people can increase their knowledge in this concern besides academic places such as workshops, suitable and invaluable books, and diverse resources on the Internet, to name but a few. As a result, people can systematically learn how to be a good leader in diverse situations even they do not have inert talent at the beginning.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that although people who have inert talent to be a prominent leader can become a good leader, people can learn to be an excellent one either by gathering experiences in workplace and they can be more familiar with diverse aspects of issues and problems, or by expanding their knowledge through participation in an excellent academic program and learn the systematic and correct way to be an appropriate leader in diverse situations
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an excellent manner" with adverb for "excellent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...blems. They learn how to solve problems in an excellent manner and how to manage and lead in these sit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unexpected way" with adverb for "unexpected"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ver, the educational system has evolved in an unexpected way, and universities not only provide dive...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, well, for example, in short, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04979253112 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91006000534 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470954356846 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 779.4 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.080954561 48.9658058833 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 152.125 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.125 20.6045352989 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154882352879 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596668772912 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436681058476 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114591193812 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348641624144 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.