Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill.
The 20th and 21st centuries are characterized by all momentous changes they made in humans’ lives. Perhaps the most important milestone of these two centuries is the changes which they have made in science. There is no doubt that science has been developed dramatically and a lot of new fields of study have been created in recent decades. Besides, they have become perplexing(highly sophisticated) and intricate. A plethora of people is the conviction that people should strengthen several abilities and have information about various subjects. Others, on the other hand, take a radically different point of view and allege that they should concentrate on a specific field and gain information about that profoundly. I am of the opinion that both of the mentioned viewpoints have their own merits and drawbacks, and following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
Before the modern era, human beings did not have adequate information about their environment and it was possible to be aware of all fields of science. Scientists had several titles in the past. For instance, Avicenna, One one of the most famous Persian scientists, is known as a mathematician, physician, astronomer and philosopher. Conversely, nowadays, the amount of information which exists is incredibly high and constantly growing. The refreshingly noteworthy statistics revealed by a recently conducted research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) revealed that the amount of information doubles every four years. Consequently, it is not possible for a person to be knowledgeable enough in all fields. Even it is unlikely for a person to gain all information of one field. People have to use each other’s specialities in groups and don’t do not need to become an expert in all fields. That’s That is why many people believe that scientists should concentrate on a specific field.
Different fields of science are connected to each other/inextricably intertwined and form linked parts of a chain. For instance, medical sciences and electrical engineering seem completely irrelevant fields at the first glance; however, nowadays, doctors are dependent on electrical equipment, mainly used for diagnostic purposes/diagnosis, which is designed and built by electrical engineers. Without these facilities, medical sciences were as capable as they were 2 centuries ago. Furthermore, engineers have to use the knowledge of doctors to develop these the equipment/these facilities. Therefore, they have no other choice but working together, and they need to know about each other’s fields to work together easier more easily. In my personal opinion, it is impossible for two persons who does not have any information about each other’s capabilities to work together on the same issue. They need to be familiar with other one’s expertise rudimentarily.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that although people should concentrate on and become proficient in a specific field, they ought to have rudimentary information about other fields. Admittedly, various fields of science depend on each other and can be used together to cause a propulsion in science and make the life more convenient for people and develop the knowledge of human about the cosmos; however, scientists should have deep information about their field of study and try to expand the borders of science in that field as well. (Number of words: approximately 520 words)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: One
...es in the past. For instance, Avicenna, One one of the most famous Persian scientists, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recently conducted research'.
Suggestion: recently conducted research
...ingly noteworthy statistics revealed by a recently conducted research at the Massachusetts Institute of Techn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 749, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ork together easier more easily. In my personal opinion, it is impossible for two persons who d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 979, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her one's expertise rudimentarily. In short, all the aforementioned reasons...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'for instance', 'in short', 'no doubt', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.218298555377 0.229887763892 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.147672552167 0.158761421928 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.107544141252 0.0866891130778 124% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0642054574639 0.046263068375 139% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0304975922953 0.0685040099705 45% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120385232745 0.118717715034 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0304975922953 0.0351676179071 87% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.24480191705 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0256821829856 0.0309702414327 83% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0963081861958 0.0887237588012 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0128410914928 0.0209618222197 61% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00802568218299 0.0139019557991 58% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3505.0 2387.08602151 147% => OK
No of words: 541.0 408.028673835 133% => OK
Chars per words: 6.47874306839 5.86048508987 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.48200974243 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.417744916821 0.338922669872 123% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.321626617375 0.251872472559 128% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.253234750462 0.174417080927 145% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.199630314233 0.112833075102 177% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24480191705 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49168207024 0.524397521467 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 58.8814030767 59.2087087015 99% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6684587814 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.8076923077 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4115201898 48.84282405 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.807692308 120.699889404 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8076923077 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.615384615385 0.644075263715 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 52.9703540452 45.7405998639 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.52317880795 1.45489161554 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121211226514 0.300154397459 40% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121793591868 0.103427244359 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0926663360079 0.0752933317313 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.441842979617 0.497263757937 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139183145487 0.151897553556 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447983326955 0.114077575197 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310694485577 0.0781384742642 40% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.41780401983 0.336927656856 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0350064115996 0.067059652881 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089982324271 0.210909579961 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00369796746317 0.0618886996521 6% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.91756272401 264% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 10.0 2.75985663082 362% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.