Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Parents are the best teachers.
Always, discussing that parents are the best teachers or not, is a challenging story. Some people are leading proponents of the claim that parents can teach everything to their children like a teacher in a school. However, I firmly believe that parents cannot be the best teacher. In the following paragraph, I will elaborate on my viewpoint by introducing two reasons.
The first remarkable point to be mentioned is that parents are biased related to their children; it means parents think their children are the cleverest and smartest kids in the world. They train their children when they are little kids. These parents believe that their kids should study the earliest besides other kids who are of the same age. These children have to study many courses that never know about them. Children should play with their friends instead of difficult study courses. For example, when my friend was a child, her mother taught her some subjects of math. Her mother was thinking, for thriving in the future, my friend should learn those topics. When my friend went to school, she failed in an entrance exam. Although she knew many of the problems, she failed on her exam. This event is because her mother couldn’t teach her very well. This example demonstrates that parents are not always the best teacher.
The second reason I would like to mention is that parents' methods of teaching are not up to date and they are very old. Parents passed some courses when they were young people, and most of technics and methods that they learned are very old and unusable now. Teachers are very up to date and try to learn the newest methods and to improve better in their field. My friend is a compelling example of this. When my friend is learned math, she learned some old methods that were not unfashionable. Because she learned those methods when she was a child, it was very hard for her to adapted to new methods.
To wrap it up, all the reasons, as mentioned earlier, lead us to the conclusion that parents are not the best teacher. It happened because parents are biased related to their children, and parents' methods of teaching are not up to date.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
Always, discussing that parents are the best t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the technics') or simply say ''most technics''.
Suggestion: most of the technics; most technics
...ourses when they were young people, and most of technics and methods that they learned are very ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...methods of teaching are not up to date.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76737967914 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36552450778 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5652772787 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5217391304 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2608695652 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52173913043 5.45110844103 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109496995644 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407199562378 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468487021392 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929814127328 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510273673038 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.