Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Learning had become a vital aspect of each one of us because of the demand in education. It is "a hot potato" topic of the day that the question who influence the students? In my view, I agree with the statement that my lecturer influenced me more than my best friends. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, teachers have high knowledge than my friends because present-day lectures are highly educated like masters in the teaching field. In today's circumstance teaching profession is highly respected than any other occupation. For instance, recent research in a news article which I read two days back says that teachers are highly paid jobs In European countries. This is because they deal with youngsters who are the future leaders of the country. It is the responsibility of the teacher to act as a trailblazer for each student. On the other hand, friends are good to support each other but when it comes to the knowledge aspect, they are also in the same boat as us with no much experience or pieces of information to exchange. Hence, there is no room to learn a lot from friends. As a result, I support that teachers are the ideal pathfinder to shape the students.
Next, professors are meant to transfer their skills to students because they are experts with their techniques. This enhances students to face the hurdles without any trepidation and to overcome the same. My own school life experience is a compelling example of this. During my high school two years back, I was an average student in maths subject. Most of the time, I get a borderline pass mark in my class. My maths teacher analyzed my problems, why my scores are low only in maths subject when compare to other subjects. In other words, he found my strengths and weakness clearly. Consequently, he found that I like games as my biggest strength. Therefore, my teacher came up with the best possible solution for me. That is, learning math by playing the board game. By this way, I understood the basic concept of multiplication, division, subtraction, and addition. During my final year examination, this method really worked well and I topped the class. In contrast, my friends would have just helped me how to handle the exam and not finding the cause of it. Hence, I think mentors can analyze the facts and find a better solution than friends.
To sum up, for the aforementioned reasons I strongly believe that teachers can impact the students and regulate as a pathfinder in a proper way because of his in-depth knowledge in the subject and because it is easy to transfer their skills to students by analyzing the facts about students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 683, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ey are also in the same boat as us with no much experience or pieces of informatio...
^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e students and regulate as a pathfinder in a proper way because of his in-depth knowledge in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, really, so, therefore, well, for instance, i feel, i think, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in my view, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2229.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77301927195 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72240481386 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531049250535 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7229507104 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5555555556 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2962962963 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.37037037037 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196812346818 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483666523102 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508300831366 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128904938857 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315736324843 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.