Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Learning had become a vital aspect of each one of us because of the demand in education. It is "a hot potato" topic of the day that the question who influence the students? In my view, I agree with the statement that my lecturer influenced me more than my best friends. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, teachers have high knowledge than my friends, which is a good harbinger to learn more and face contemporary situations. Present-day lectures are highly educated like masters in the teaching field. Moreover, the teaching profession is highly respected than any other occupation. Recent research in a news article which I read two days back says that teachers are highly paid jobs In European countries. This is because they deal with youngsters who are the future leaders of the country. It is the responsibility of the teacher to act as a trailblazer and teach what is good and bad for each student. For example, when is at my high school three years back. My history professor thought me indispensable of politics while roleplaying between peers in the class. This was an amazing play, which I decided to become a counsellor at the end of the game. And, now in my real life, I became the counsellor of Harris County. On the other hand, friends are good to support each other but when it comes to the knowledge aspect, they are also same like as us with not having many pieces of information to learn or exchange. Friends might bias us because they don’t want to lose the friendship. Hence, there is no room to learn a lot from them. As a result, I support that teachers are the ideal pathfinder to shape the students.
Next, professors are meant to transfer their skills to students because they are experts with their techniques. This enhances students to face the hurdles without any trepidation and to overcome the same. My own school life experience is a compelling example of this. During my high school two years back, I was an average student in maths subject. Most of the time, I get a borderline pass mark in my class. My maths teacher analyzed my problems, why my scores are low only in maths subject when compare to other subjects. In other words, he found my strengths and weakness clearly. Consequently, he found that I like games as my biggest strength. Therefore, my teacher came up with the best possible solution for me. That is, learning math by playing the board game. By this way, I understood the basic concept of multiplication, division, subtraction, and addition. During my final year examination, this method really worked well and I topped the class. In contrast, my friends would have just helped me how to handle the exam as a short term solution and not find the root cause of it. This might lead me in the wrong direction. Hence, I think mentors can analyze the facts and find a better solution than friends.
To recapitulate, for the aforementioned reasons I strongly believe that teachers can impact the students and regulate as a pathfinder in a proper way because of his in-depth knowledge in the subject and because it is easy to transfer their skills to students by analyzing the facts about students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e students and regulate as a pathfinder in a proper way because of his in-depth knowledge in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i feel, i think, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2670.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 563.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74245115453 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71830055922 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 212.727598566 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513321492007 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 24.0 9.59856630824 250% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.6003584229 165% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9908690351 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5294117647 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5588235294 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175833586901 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396314786931 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505265453739 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124099781674 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341774608596 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.