Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.
That in our today's convoluted and hectic life, the human desire is in insatiable is an axiom. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this idea is whether it pays off with experiencing a plethora of issues even those containing dangers for one person. Although it is a little tough to reach a consensus on this issue, I am to a great extent on the belief that it is highly depend on the characteristics of one accepting the risks in lieu of obtaining some invaluable experiences or persisting on a humdrum life. The following paragraphs would elaborate on the thesis.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons which justifies the thesis is that the capacity of one person to admit the side effects or pitfalls of his decision about opting some dangerous paths. Going into the depth, even attempting each new thing brings about some stress and tension, by contrast, according to the famous proverb saying that each obstacle which you contemplate carries a surge of difficulties for you, is the one which contribute to your growth. As a matter of fact, this is the hardship time and occasion demonstrating you your true potential, therefore, it is critically essential to put yourself in dangers sometimes to thrive as a real human. Not only will you derive precious experiences thanks to the existence of challenges in risky ways, but also, you can have an opportunity to utilize your previous achievements to devise some ways to obviate and circumvent the problems.
Alongside with the first reason elaborated on above, there is another subtle point requiring to be scrutinized meticulously and that is the combination of both planning and risks in order to reach your destination. It is all transparent that seizing all chances is the crucial element propelling someone toward the prosperity, on the contrary, having a full-scheduled, logical and discernible plan takes precedence over accepting all chances, since there may be lots of risks pushing you on undesirable and adverse situation. To delineate, fusing both plan and possessing the ability of embracing the risks instead of adopting the tedious life style will assure your future success in your life. To shed more light on this issue, according to the results of the survey posted in Time Magazine, the more the individuals are ready to jeopardize their life, accompanied with planning, the more they will be predisposed to flourish in their private life and the more they can shine like the sun in other people' lives to help them in unearthing their accurate right paths. Nonetheless, what I mentioned above might not be overgeneralized to all contexts. There exist some humans who prefer to persist on scheduled life without any challenges and excitements, in contrast, their lives are full of progress and satisfaction. They are more of an exception rather than a general rule.
Drawing upon the reason, in spite of the subsistence of some exceptions which are excluded from the general rule, I firmly hold the opinion that the person's features and discreet plan can be deemed the main culprits of this issue. The benefits of the combination of both taking risk and having plan are too enormous to fathom. Not only can one grow as a real person, but also he can raise his tolerance and increment new potentials to surmount problems in his real and severe life.
(582 words)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
... extent on the belief that it is highly depend on the characteristics of one accepting...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, in contrast, as a matter of fact, in spite of, on the contrary, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2811.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 561.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01069518717 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85965563409 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 305.0 212.727598566 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54367201426 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 887.4 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.6804035707 48.9658058833 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.166666667 100.406767564 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1666666667 20.6045352989 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111360332506 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336071282323 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280877698005 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0604488698857 0.150856017488 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230937006232 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 11.7677419355 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 86.8835125448 188% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.