Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
It is undeniable that dramatic changes have happend in recent decades which have affected all aspects of human life. In this regard, some people believe that teachers were more respected in the past compared to nowadays. However, other may take an opposite viewpoint. In my opinion, the first belief is true. In what follows, I will demonstrate my perspective.
The first point coming to my mind is that the only source of information in the past was the teachers and therefore, they were very respected by the people. In other words, today with the advent of technology all people can access different information from over the world and hence the teachers play a less important role in human's life. For instance, in our country, Iran, students have to pass a tough exam to enter collages. In the past, all students attempted to find a skillful tutor for their specialized lessons like mathematics, physics, biology and so on. on those days, it was so difficult for teachers to find free time for teaching since the demand for their services was very high. In contrast, today modern technologies have helped students to access any kind of information they need very easily and therefore, the rate of valuation is decreased automatically.
Another reason which deserves some words here that one of the most focuses of traditional education systems was on respecting the elders and teachers. However, nowadays modern education systems are more person-centered and they encourage students to not obey others and to follow their ideas and dreams. Hence, it is obvious that such a person cannot respect their teachers like before since he/she wants to follow his/her opinion. For example, in our country, it is compulsory for students to wear a veil from elementary school. In the past, students obeyed this law easily because they thought it is a kind of disrespect to their teachers if they didn't listen to their words, while today students oppose this law easily since they have learned that they do not have to satisfy others at any cost.
From what has been discussed above, we can reach safely the conclusion that things changed so that teachers today are less rappriciated rather than past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vent of technology all people can access different information from over the worl...
^^
Line 11, column 650, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...of disrespect to their teachers if they didnt listen to their words, while today stud...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, kind of, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0272479564 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60091699388 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542234332425 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9882025724 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.529411765 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171388197852 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515127856607 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672096320859 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102240151224 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141207662165 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.