Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, Discussion about different points of views is a controversial debate in all societies. Although some people believe that students should learn about various perspectives in their schools from teachers, it is my opinion that discussing about society and politics can be harmful for students and distract their focus on theirs lessons. The following paragraphs will illustrate my view point.
First of all, talking about teacher's point of view can be very challenging. When a teacher lets their students know how he is thinking about community problems, students strongly want to discuss about their individual perspectives. This is because they are young and they cannot control their emotional behaviors so much. Thus, they continue to the discussion and it makes the class absolutely uncontrolable. Finally, the teacher waste his class time too much and cannot finish his desired syllabus in the residual time. Then, he unintentionally forced himself to teach faster in the rest of class time, which can harm students learning and makes teacher put much effort to clarify the lesson for the students.
Secondly, as a consequent effect, it is possible that some students even lost their interest to the class and do not pay attention to their teacher anymore. Since students are still immature, a challenge between them and their teacher will affect on their feelings. After that, students get angy from their teacher although they might do not show this emotion. It makes students not to listen to their teacher and spend the class time to other activities. As a result, these students do not try to understand that class and will get bad scores in their exams. For example, when I was at highschool, once our physics teacher said a sentence about our president unappropriately. One of the students who was keen on the president, got angry and starts to answer the teacher. This started a long argument in class and taked too much time. After thirty minutes, our teacher could finish the discussion. I never forget my classmate nervousness. Finally, he never could make a good relation with our teacher any more and his scores in that class stated to get worse. This shows that a little problem might make a big problem.
In conclusion, although some people think that arguing about social and political problems in schools have some beneficial aspects, I strongly believe it will have a lot of bad results in the students feelings and understading. This is because not only will some students hate their teacher, but also the teacher will not finish lessons and subjects in that class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...nge between them and their teacher will affect on their feelings. After that, students ge...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, talking about, as a result, by and large, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06032482599 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65608258222 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519721577726 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7888690408 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8260869565 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7391304348 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69565217391 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227656689555 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722521489892 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446472254071 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141984673393 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356078474517 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.