Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, discussion about different points of views is a controversial debate in all societies. Although some people believe that students should learn about various perspectives in their schools from teachers, it is my opinion that discussing society and politics can be harmful to students and distract their focus on their lessons. The following paragraphs will illustrate my viewpoint.
First of all, talking about the teacher's point of view can be very challenging. When a teacher lets their students know how he is thinking about community problems, students strongly want to discuss their individual perspectives. This is because they are young and cannot control their emotional behaviors so much. Thus, they continue the discussion, and it makes the class absolutely uncontrollable. Finally, the teacher wastes his class time too much and cannot finish his desired syllabus in the residual time. Then, he unintentionally forced himself to teach faster in the rest of class time, which can harm students learning and makes the teacher put much effort to clarify the lesson for the students.
Secondly, as a consequent effect, it is possible that some students even lose their interest in the class and do not pay attention to their teacher anymore. Since students are still immature, a challenge between them and their teacher will affect their feelings. After that, students get angry with their teacher, although they might do not show this emotion. It makes students not to listen to their teacher and spend class time on other activities. As a result, these students do not try to understand that class and will get bad scores in their exams. For example, when I was at high school, once our physics teacher said a sentence about our president inappropriately. One of the students who was keen on the president got angry and started to answer the teacher. This started a long argument in class and took too much time. After thirty minutes, our teacher could finish the discussion. I never forget my classmate nervousness. Finally, he never could make a good relation with our teacher anymore, and his scores in that class started to get worse. This shows that a little problem might make a big problem.
In conclusion, although some people think that arguing about social and political problems in schools have some beneficial aspects, I strongly believe it will have a lot of bad results in the students' feelings and understanding. This is because not only will some students hate their teacher, but also the teacher will not finish lessons and subjects in that class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
By and large, discussion about different...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agraphs will illustrate my viewpoint. First of all, talking about the teachers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... clarify the lesson for the students. Secondly, as a consequent effect, it is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tle problem might make a big problem. In conclusion, although some people thin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, talking about, as a result, by and large, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08685446009 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68632409558 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516431924883 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2348460698 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2173913043 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5217391304 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69565217391 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.85842293907 415% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232340892504 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729681386326 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478481580044 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143508549535 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360381580459 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.