Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily
Friendship play an essential role in humans' life. The life become more enjoyable and bearable when individuals have good friends around. In this regard, I think the ability to maintain friendships with fewer people over a long period of time is more vital for happiness. The reasons to support my viewpoint are elaborated on in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, people can trust their old friends in the challenging conditions rather than new ones. To be more specific, every one has been engaged in various issues to provide a comfortable life for themselves and their family members. It is evident that when people face some problems, they are seeking to ask his or her help to pass this situation. In this case, individuals only asks from their family members or friends whom they are mutual trust among them. Old friends play a significant role in the lives of human beings because they are like a family members. On the other hand, new friends whom people do not know each others very well can not be reliable options in the mentioned circumstances. Therefore, people by using their old friends' experiences will become able to solve their problems and bring happiness in their lives.
Moreover, old friends have more in common to share with each other and are able to memorize these events to become happy. To put it in other words, when people know each other for a long time, they have numerous memorable and remarkable events to share with together. In this case, reviewing these events bring about a remarkable moment for both. An example can shed some light on this issue. When I was in primary school, I formed a friendship with few persons. We had a same interests and hobbies, so we enjoyed to talk and play together. When we graduated from school, we did not end up our friendship. We saw each other in specific days and we review those memorable time. Now I am 23 years old boy but talking about those times remember good time that I have spent with my old friends.
In conclusion, having all the mentioned reasons and points into account, I do believe that old friends are more important for happiness rather than making new friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'plays'.
Suggestion: plays
Friendship play an essential role in humans life. The l...
^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...iendships with fewer people over a long period of time is more vital for happiness. The reason...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ated on in the following paragraphs. To begin with, people can trust their ol...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and bring happiness in their lives. Moreover, old friends have more in commo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... We had a same interests and hobbies, so we enjoyed to talk and play together. Wh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, talking about, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75531914894 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49033754059 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529255319149 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6894963957 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1428571429 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9047619048 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271957020927 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776883828573 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874343538206 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188138812911 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064850646392 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.