Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.

Friends are on the most important source of success and confidence in everyone's life which can resemble a mainstay in crucial times, especially the old and closer friends. I personally believe that having long term relationship with a small and specific number of people would have more significant influences on our happiness and mental peace than making many new friends from various types of stratum and personality. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.

The first exquisite point that should be mentioned is that with old friends you have a lot of common values and hobbies which can be shared and enjoyed. They know you much more than other people and could get along with you easily. Besides, being in the front of old and close buddies you do not have to care too much about what you say or do. Everything that you express or convey would not hurt any of your practical interests. It is just the way of relief and relaxation so if you want to vent your emotions an old close friend is always a better choice since he is more familiar with your personality than new friends so you do not have to worry about judgmental reactions or strange face impressions.

Another reason drives me to indicate is that the level of trust and intimacy in long-term relationships is not comparable with new friends due to the long history behind this kind of relationship. Old friends are more dependable and reliable. You can be confident that you would have someone in your back in case of emergencies. You are never alone so it saves you a load of troubles. But you can not count on new friends so much since that relation just formed and the foundation of your friendship is not consolidated. For having a strong and dependable relation with profound intimacy, you have to past through a lot of experience with each other and make history together. The history in a relationship brings consistency and reciprocal respect and support which are resulted from cognition during the time bed. So from the alluded perspective old and close friends are preferable to new peers.

Judging from what I have mentioned above I should reinforce my perspective that antiquity in relationships is monumental and significant so having a circle of old and close friends have some advantages and priority over making new friends occasionally and easily. Because with old buddied you have a lot of in common and can share many of your feelings and entertainments. Besides due to intimacy and affection between you the old group of friends is more dependable and the pillars of your friendship are more strong and sustainable compared to new ones.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will explore in the following essay. The first exquisite point that should be...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eactions or strange face impressions. Another reason drives me to indicate is ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...friends are preferable to new peers. Judging from what I have mentioned above...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, so, i feel, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 13.8261648746 224% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2215.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8152173913 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72609995836 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476086956522 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.239762013 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.578947368 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2105263158 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.31578947368 5.45110844103 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298946062461 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100065677168 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594248509337 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203933792848 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210725320403 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.